From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25048 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 2012 19:34:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 24828 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Mar 2012 19:34:43 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-vx0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-vx0-f169.google.com) (209.85.220.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:34:30 +0000 Received: by vcbfk14 with SMTP id fk14so4471685vcb.0 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:34:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-system-of-record :x-gm-message-state; bh=O3DZE+g+DW3JGFJKY6kP+hZJC45s4Gy1X/k80JBGNs0=; b=iepweBaSMMpakmUYVdT9XiqfrWxbtb1pvo9h+FCw0UugJRKLIG77GvqBevkCeqx1PN yyAwZkOO4YONnVJj/eDYvtXCrno64cZaDVPW0ok819MRKnXVdI8c80hEKojqXYwXkZ4f PS/mYtXViOEoSEdZIdil0s7bAazmV+cyYCpW9ZmX+DthvX9X+8aBMRBD8TvVBC98N4Rj fP6dkqG04eC9guk27d2odn7rGjNf/h3f68AjCy6MJR+q8dUHVLKapO3bVl8FQAuFWf6C 2STapb3TSk0rqDwS00qnLbAhbJwyimi2p3sndG9pMfKXkzhQsIHl1jiHEqgX2PBMOV20 XRBA== Received: by 10.52.34.65 with SMTP id x1mr5350983vdi.122.1331840069670; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:34:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.34.65 with SMTP id x1mr5350971vdi.122.1331840069530; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:34:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.187.12 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:34:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120315192931.GA11584@redhat.com> References: <20120314175451.GA20072@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120315105117.GA3076@redhat.com> <833999wxkt.fsf@gnu.org> <20120315181002.GA10803@redhat.com> <831uotwx2d.fsf@gnu.org> <4F623553.5050204@redhat.com> <83zkbhvhhz.fsf@gnu.org> <20120315184026.GA28322@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120315192931.GA11584@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:34:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFA take 6] Allow setting breakpoints on inline functions (PR 10738) From: Doug Evans To: Jan Kratochvil , Eli Zaretskii , Pedro Alves , dje@google.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, mark@klomp.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-System-Of-Record: true X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQls52C1x08rtaOtQZog34JyB7s3ceaHO9O/W06/pyycWfX9SDUGLwSeisQjaf/5eBiS0+kto8n2kRIjxDVkmhA+gHkMK2ZejFI/oL9RPsy2Rmos48Etrw1ftmRtQLZkGpZ6jjwp+B1707FTqZ2gOoPsfju0JQ== X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00576.txt.bz2 On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Gary Benson wrote: > Jan Kratochvil wrote: >> On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:36:24 +0100, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> > Do not reject obsolete .gdb_index sections with possibly >> > inaccurate info. >> > >> > However, if everyone else is tired of bikeshedding, go ahead with >> > whatever you like. >> >> I would like make clear from the option help that it will have >> negative effect on GDB functionality; that it is not just some >> performance tuning. =A0So leaving the right wording up to you, just >> expressing my original goal. > > "Innaccurate" is a good word, thanks Eli. =A0I will make the changes > and commit the patch tomorrow if nobody has any further objections. To be honest, I don't like "inaccurate". But I'm not going to push it.