From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32203 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2012 17:33:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 32190 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Apr 2012 17:33:56 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-vx0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-vx0-f169.google.com) (209.85.220.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:33:43 +0000 Received: by vcbfy7 with SMTP id fy7so889329vcb.0 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:33:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-system-of-record :x-gm-message-state; bh=C1lxCQD2Rk6A6MuiheGy+C9rRnOoxcJMXNuDAUcVpwU=; b=WE9WjDdEGJ1p2uYSYWe5C8J/xV62yeyQVk3ImSE1/6aRWaVpoUwTMBPfBehyE1Lqy+ EYd6BBoUOvRRTcfe5S2IFUYbxjup2KYLpQDrBkGjyzXBtAZI0beDc4eUKYs+Y1XX8Ppz VHs/mY3O3Teg5onOWU3BVg9zWMPqnCc6w1TwCYgGlC1fa/0XUFVOlaaW9cL1jFUrcxAI +KkXZNLS6oa5oYW9YcqKwm/zhhn9aDbtSRL0lLQF3RrSLGQ+nMhLlZ/Ob2HPnhP6q01A yzfLYaMrlP64dtzFeyTbo2YNgrbtIhWaRwMjTWaMbydFHoUg29BHh4qg+UMSB0hK2Ilu Qn2Q== Received: by 10.52.67.208 with SMTP id p16mr10357792vdt.93.1335548022828; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:33:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.67.208 with SMTP id p16mr10357783vdt.93.1335548022752; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:33:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.165.2 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:33:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83lilhgk1o.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83bomgfcbt.fsf@gnu.org> <87ipgna94k.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83y5pjedjp.fsf@gnu.org> <87397qa9a0.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83fwbqinsw.fsf@gnu.org> <83pqatgp9k.fsf@gnu.org> <83lilhgk1o.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC - doc] Add note about the possibility of symbols getting moved across blocks From: Doug Evans To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: sivachandra@google.com, tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-System-Of-Record: true X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmbX5A5pdwjcZxZa4EVSXLnV0Z38UWEE2pGpOR1uAHwkHo8jt6CEYmbPiGkm0hgPHpbsNNCQimUJV3Y4TP7K+IJw2Ei4ASzywMA4qfIGVd9Jlt/6RmISyyaEwUnV4enNN4SXs2rxgd0dFr0Jrffx4IpMCbhew== X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg01020.txt.bz2 On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 09:49:35 -0700 >> From: Doug Evans >> Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org >> >> > =A0A @code{gdb.Block} is iterable. =A0The iterator returns the symbols >> > =A0(@pxref{Symbols In Python}) local to the block. =A0Python programs >> > =A0should not assume that a specific block object will always contain a >> > =A0given symbol, since changes in @value{GDBN} features and >> > =A0infrastructure may cause symbols move across blocks in a symbol >> > =A0table. >> >> I think that's close enough. >> >> s/symbols move/symbols to move/ =A0? > > I think omitting "to" makes it more correct English. Really? Huh. It's not important enough, so whichever "works for me".