From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 66833 invoked by alias); 5 Jun 2015 15:19:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 66818 invoked by uid 89); 5 Jun 2015 15:19:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-oi0-f42.google.com Received: from mail-oi0-f42.google.com (HELO mail-oi0-f42.google.com) (209.85.218.42) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 15:19:07 +0000 Received: by oihb142 with SMTP id b142so55488434oih.3 for ; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 08:19:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=SQJa9s3U53KgP8/SLhSjBFguXCwEjsZhAN7qhsm9FkU=; b=Aqf+eh3SiCB/UQB6ff14E+8hovJUFpco9ZXJjnlpZbk9cVMprUszqa3CdBGXREaq55 TI3o7y65PbvOR5TZGReK3H8mOHsPwK8XKaH/ujpplFVAnk+vjl+ZSqa2OoRLgIuWCiAh ArfIktS6xAbsMd7KAPA7bvOc9AI3P8i8kDiHQjslf5rnbc+yRj+BZwtSGWDejPnRKQNy KgdcyjSnqv6VDGASeacYmGHqQsnEmqHJugWoVCsNUWG67NeTc68HStSqOMPXNGbwfZiM 4RKrgbgpD+GaMIoxF+qJXbCq/gDVbX358ytSV+aRrGdorknLcdnaqP5T7ToqbKnMvhTE /gTQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmUZvVVwNAX7uqetoRQ0WcxcFyqAtSRw2S+V4VUTd0hBGOYImU1yg/tn0K1mWlBO5lQvzMe MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.84.136 with SMTP id i130mr2498013oib.114.1433517545829; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 08:19:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.89.99 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 08:19:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150605124035.GA1995@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <20150604193820.GA18453@host1.jankratochvil.net> <86d21ao5vw.fsf@gmail.com> <20150605124035.GA1995@host1.jankratochvil.net> Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 15:19:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [obv] compile-print.exp: xfail->kfail for '@' GDB array operator From: Doug Evans To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Yao Qi , gdb-patches , Phil Muldoon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg00085.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 5:40 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > 'compile print' should one day replace the standard 'print' command, like in > LLDB. Otherwise 'compile print' makes no sense. Just so we're on the same page, the plan isn't to remove the "standard 'print' command", right? [The print (output, etc.) commands would either use the builtin support or compile print.]