From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-122970-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 8107 invoked by alias); 16 May 2015 15:51:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 8091 invoked by uid 89); 16 May 2015 15:51:04 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-ob0-f180.google.com
Received: from mail-ob0-f180.google.com (HELO mail-ob0-f180.google.com) (209.85.214.180) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sat, 16 May 2015 15:51:03 +0000
Received: by obcus9 with SMTP id us9so97392330obc.2        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Sat, 16 May 2015 08:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date         :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;        bh=arR+IMmXmi4z755sLnzwhVyoFOSJPf18/psbGgkyIXc=;        b=fWcIWPOsox6GTBzfX3nYLIVH5JheZuz6u1lxZgltBUcwDYwNbus6qbk6aNgCzRw/C6         CdTZMPu6c9GwqHb9JjjA2DGXxkqZhIkggo40Ttdc8P0T1QKU2H5Ng8akpWwDweSy42cq         GPdlcYNWKPdtrocMpFOt1IkX0XWGe6EShTpthxvtUZiWs3tH214QAgnzNzPC+Oj0hepC         CRTrCb28ujsqRX0bhhfNw0esJtCE7bwvxvxF8PRM7p0NfGGOIVemZga5rkCVEglSQ1yA         7aajmp+qOhCFnc/8YDRKU71FnON3+jnmYERI+CwdiC5XoC3ptY1JHiNtwquMY25MQ8oq         MDHg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlzolJyMQrlAqRHvH/E2h2y6XbH0XVfrvrLVmyGbPiRIGUuxg0zc9rQpno05PpmpS/TSnzC
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.101.195 with SMTP id fi3mr13207056oeb.65.1431791461632; Sat, 16 May 2015 08:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.89.99 with HTTP; Sat, 16 May 2015 08:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20150516152514.GA12510@host1.jankratochvil.net>
References: <1431562331-20448-1-git-send-email-patrick@parcs.ath.cx>	<CADPb22RQi=S3ygBGL-b5+XD=Eyz+aKeQXmjE+5iSiazA-=4M7Q@mail.gmail.com>	<CA+C-WL9Nqa7G4Wh1kszePEjQ5HwFNT5MsX+J5GFCswNDY1GPVQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CADPb22SQpS1qwJ-uWQ+=JC-Z62YQBY9xGjxMRpx-2oEQHMuyiA@mail.gmail.com>	<20150516152514.GA12510@host1.jankratochvil.net>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 15:51:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CADPb22RM_eoDuOMi-t01A5gJUme5uYf+MfvvbDJzASieqETKEg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Sync readline to version 6.3 patchlevel 8
From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: Patrick Palka <patrick@parcs.ath.cx>, gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00442.txt.bz2

On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Jan Kratochvil
<jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 16 May 2015 17:23:23 +0200, Doug Evans wrote:
>> Another thought is that IWBN if the reapplication of local patches was
>> a separate commit.
>
> IIUC this would break git bisect.

It might.  Bleah.

What's the "git" way to do this (*1) that doesn't involve a lot of
manual effort?
---
(*1): "this" being extracting out individual local patches later in
time (say a year from now).