From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13143 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2012 16:56:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 13134 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Feb 2012 16:56:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-vx0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-vx0-f169.google.com) (209.85.220.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:56:42 +0000 Received: by vcbf13 with SMTP id f13so235497vcb.0 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 08:56:42 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of dje@google.com designates 10.52.71.166 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.52.71.166; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of dje@google.com designates 10.52.71.166 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=dje@google.com; dkim=pass header.i=dje@google.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.52.71.166]) by 10.52.71.166 with SMTP id w6mr15218470vdu.20.1329929802175 (num_hops = 1); Wed, 22 Feb 2012 08:56:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.71.166 with SMTP id w6mr12449979vdu.20.1329929802130; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 08:56:42 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.71.166 with SMTP id w6mr12449967vdu.20.1329929802042; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 08:56:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.21.4 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 08:56:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120222145337.GA17726@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120220155848.GA5813@redhat.com> <20120220194804.GA5968@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120222145337.GA17726@host2.jankratochvil.net> Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 17:20:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFA take 5] Allow setting breakpoints on inline functions (PR 10738) From: Doug Evans To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Eli Zaretskii , Mark Wielaard Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-System-Of-Record: true X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlJ393PG4IUfuly5k9+7o2ZSWmp9c2Y7Xh6D2M2+zhIGLiKS4D9JVku5/89HFr6B55ZL8d3lBACrT2eGSryFQOinGP2LgxmEMhnhVOzxKsxWe051OCCGX1oNRcORYm6W6qC6lKb/I0USQdyktLrKvMo0vCYlQ== X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00481.txt.bz2 On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > Hi Doug, > > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:48:04 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: >> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:58:49 +0100, Gary Benson wrote: >> > This version of the patch has been updated to add a new command line >> > option, --allow-incomplete-gdb-indexes, >> >> Sorry I was a bit offline, I believe such option would be OK just as a v= endor >> patch. > > with some more discussions about it Tom also shares this opinion. =A0I th= ink > Google should just apply the provided patch downstream. =A0Upstream/Gary = should > drop that --allow-incomplete-gdb-indexes option completely, incl. droppin= g the > GDB code for backward compatibility with .gdb_index v4 and v5. Setting aside Google's needs, If I were allowed to decide, I would require v4,v5 compatibility for at least one release.