From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 64465 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2015 17:34:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 64446 invoked by uid 89); 11 Mar 2015 17:34:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-ob0-f180.google.com Received: from mail-ob0-f180.google.com (HELO mail-ob0-f180.google.com) (209.85.214.180) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 17:34:56 +0000 Received: by obcva8 with SMTP id va8so10476626obc.8 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 10:34:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=7NKOmhOhEykgtuYaNcY/2NUWhoa5eW0SDe1hSn+lISE=; b=aIxt9cvXvbq0QhtGD4x58sAmHr9x/5P2951jD04MP8FUlC8zLocKl/0XwTzh5Wiol9 RyIaQvJtzJh0wZ+qB2Qfv38mFEJiy4zF3VnTwGAeE7HHirDGnhgwMZzeR5uO6OYsod7c W5/3SdoGf86e8vn5Lmvf8joxLFCY+sG+Mvdyo23TyZy3y7+CPA2Nv/Kl9szVjTeGczP5 07UW+YuMyOwr0chCof6xKKQAsUBQEQptDUiX6qwBS3QIg5mMtOYXxxTHjhtCmEQ1bZca UyGVpORlEUabwFB1Q4QgjtIL9okWJzQYyOe/rjYjCOAfFOIOlmH+XGcBhJEMf9PLIRsD TjLQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmuYhxZ202YQE+KiZ8y0+QN82qtxI5kdTJGhLXkTHsiYiIlkRrsFW2p9+G+TS4egBrJHTOH MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.24.97 with SMTP id t1mr30511088obf.77.1426095294696; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 10:34:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.142.226 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 10:34:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87twxrncld.fsf@igalia.com> References: <21714.40641.510825.30998@ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com> <54E71694.1080304@redhat.com> <87ioei31uj.fsf@igalia.com> <87d24p19tt.fsf@igalia.com> <54FD7DAA.7010603@redhat.com> <87twxrncld.fsf@igalia.com> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 17:34:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Provide the ability to write the frame unwinder in Python From: Doug Evans To: Andy Wingo Cc: Alexander Smundak , Phil Muldoon , gdb-patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-03/txt/msg00304.txt.bz2 On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Andy Wingo wrote: > [...] > What do you think about merging the SnifferInfo and UnwindInfo objects > into an EphemeralFrame object? It would be nice to use the same nouns > on the Guile and Python sides. Agreed. I'd like to see the two implementations be as identical as is reasonably possible. Consistency Is Good. [Which isn't to advocate for one implementation or the other yet. You guys are writing both the API side and the client side, so you're more up to speed on what you need.]