From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-86146-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 5136 invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2011 19:28:32 -0000
Received: (qmail 5006 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Dec 2011 19:28:31 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-vx0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-vx0-f169.google.com) (209.85.220.169)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:28:16 +0000
Received: by vcbfk26 with SMTP id fk26so1085556vcb.0        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:28:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.74.229 with SMTP id x5mr1579vdv.29.1323890895405;        Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:28:15 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.74.229 with SMTP id x5mr1568vdv.29.1323890895327; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:28:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.199.4 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:28:15 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20111214185650.GA8485@host2.jankratochvil.net>
References: <20111205081911.GG28486@adacore.com>	<m34nxdoawj.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<20111209171630.GA30059@host2.jankratochvil.net>	<20111209171937.GA30594@host2.jankratochvil.net>	<m3wra5ebvq.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<20111209215319.GA5132@host2.jankratochvil.net>	<20111210160145.GA7261@host2.jankratochvil.net>	<20111211024742.GN21915@adacore.com>	<20111211092552.GA14574@host2.jankratochvil.net>	<20111211124213.GO21915@adacore.com>	<20111214185650.GA8485@host2.jankratochvil.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:43:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CADPb22QRAqkv9pSJEy5-s33a5D13XAOcaShPU=OVHhQBYap1qg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] gcc KFAILs to XFAILs [Re: [commit] testsuite: KFAIL gdb.cp/static-method.exp]
From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
X-System-Of-Record: true
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00465.txt.bz2

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Jan Kratochvil
<jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 13:42:13 +0100, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>> This is why I would say it's convenient to use KFAIL for GDB bugs only.
>
> I somehow have the same opinion and Tom declined reply, I will check this in
> with no reply:

Can someone check into gdbint.texi definitions of xfail and kfail?
There's a section "Writing Tests", seems like an appropriate place.