From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10165 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2014 22:02:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 10156 invoked by uid 89); 24 Feb 2014 22:02:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-vc0-f176.google.com Received: from mail-vc0-f176.google.com (HELO mail-vc0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 22:02:55 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f176.google.com with SMTP id la4so6382087vcb.35 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 14:02:53 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=LYE3pRhOmIMwUcW3MNRLTZjyOObaILoX1BLY11CMrSY=; b=lfC8H4OGGGiOdQD7hOZMGEwkXxNUuX9RcGTkGKXERVz7FCM6ZDjlUV1bF6tsGccPCn c/1Udga70uFJjImIsDr0x/4ySOX3lytwKhwlUX/xufROnrV22dpP9c4e5gF4IJB0U/Hh qBRpCXRsGJX4qi5MnYJAvx9s98se3vGlLm/5968sgSoBdSjmwvix3EiCok5SD9U+rqDj Js5/caVsifC7OROjhW2ctIs25Cs45IS4X2a4pKc4Fe9v63Wm+rc0ig5QwU/bQbeil296 raeL2LGyaELgcsujEGb9OFG9BKh52PfnSCNhjzNsL1QLchFPQICXkCNEp480Ii1gNlew f5LQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQllMf3MkmYMJS3jMz+dmZrp9SPMFhV6zDzhhbvk6YTFILPGSkCjD3yUPihZkPCxhiMuKLW0nfrME8J/bQfMvOeqHtEFT+oeAsaichh2BIAXpDu0979CvGsM+vQmBwGe/SjJEVj5+68BXEyJBJ+D1pvL7PvuykZ069ip9lRI6+lG3/IFIZ5HTP8kl2e7PE2p/1WLEk8bhh4oT2CZJYQGy6obpfthwg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.11.141 with SMTP id t13mr14423802vct.30.1393279373302; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 14:02:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.51.234 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 14:02:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <21254.43965.134829.97097@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> References: <21254.43965.134829.97097@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 22:02:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] value.c (record_latest_value): Fix comment. From: Doug Evans To: gdb-patches Cc: ludo@gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00733.txt.bz2 On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Doug Evans wrote: > Doug Evans writes: > > Hi. > > > > This patch fixes a comment that was found to be wrong in this thread: > > > > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-02/msg00674.html > > > > I checked as far back as 6.1.1, and it's never returned -1. > > [I could go back further, but I don't see the point.] > > > > 2014-02-20 Doug Evans > > > > * value.c (record_latest_value): Fix comment. > > Hmmm, even part of gdb still thinks record_latest_value can return -1. > > 2014-02-20 Doug Evans > > * value.c (record_latest_value): Fix comment. > * printcmd.c (print_command_1): Remove code to handle -1 return from > record_latest_value. Committed.