From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6671 invoked by alias); 3 May 2012 22:07:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 6658 invoked by uid 22791); 3 May 2012 22:07:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-vb0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-vb0-f41.google.com) (209.85.212.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 May 2012 22:07:18 +0000 Received: by vbbey12 with SMTP id ey12so2102220vbb.0 for ; Thu, 03 May 2012 15:07:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-system-of-record:x-gm-message-state; bh=LEVdRG5d3cWHCO4KFXZcKABcMHvG2cnNBdzpY7gctTE=; b=IQVKSiLNCaijbnVQr0emNCJK3Dgkw7XAKSNGJrFYq1DVyr+RVbHTcFYbLHX/k7ydFn FajJke8P7VMsXG6eaY4toRr15zTPKFiDliwXmXzYTAqjMlxOFlHDzb2FQAwYVzgp9PFt tBuGBSshhSBt3pXMWN5pqEDnzjy9dMRclvlrRZQbONRabqlGidNiOQzJ8Xz6/5fcwSc0 +gKDbUfPViqhrobCBE+JSAGAiK0iBrBWd0J1FLs7BY/u9A9CVmHDmCIOJFOBzW59CBEe GUkMDpIHAd27dnSimK0IvDvdWFZLL+4eXfLxLAU7wto+NC9hGnVLf4XUZezXGV2cLx32 6l7w== Received: by 10.220.241.12 with SMTP id lc12mr2376782vcb.22.1336082837920; Thu, 03 May 2012 15:07:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.241.12 with SMTP id lc12mr2376773vcb.22.1336082837831; Thu, 03 May 2012 15:07:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.165.2 with HTTP; Thu, 3 May 2012 15:07:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120503220430.GM15555@adacore.com> References: <8781499A-A489-42D0-80B1-75136331DBDB@adacore.com> <87mx5x40uz.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <05ADE46C-9093-4EE4-92A7-1232779DE5DC@adacore.com> <98CB5870-6AB6-40FA-B3A1-9AF8269B2909@adacore.com> <20120503150512.GI15555@adacore.com> <20120503220430.GM15555@adacore.com> Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 22:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFA] Emit a warning for ineffective set VAR = EXP command From: Doug Evans To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Tristan Gingold , Tom Tromey , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org ml" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-System-Of-Record: true X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnP2uP0FHt4MET62AELopRjfENOrBLGo+5E+oed94HM/GBMm8KekePXjZFODIK67BUngC8njRXowvUdGzOBNUOQ0V1XtcpcL6YGMaXCqNEXOmKcm2tORddtsUUbL3O451RfNVxRZGDpkxOePEVyUSMaXUgn9Q== X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00112.txt.bz2 On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> It's trivial to add tests for a few more languages. >> Whether it's worth it, I don't know. >> It may be worth it if only as an educational vehicle so people who >> don't know these other languages get exposed to them for this >> particular issue. > > I can extend the testcase to add a test with C, and perhaps we could > convince Pierre to add something for Pascal... Let's allow Tristan > to commit his patch, and then we can add to it? Either order works for me (and on whatever schedule works for you).