From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-101250-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 30633 invoked by alias); 7 May 2013 18:10:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 30624 invoked by uid 89); 7 May 2013 18:10:27 -0000
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received: from mail-vc0-f176.google.com (HELO mail-vc0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 May 2013 18:10:27 +0000
Received: by mail-vc0-f176.google.com with SMTP id ib11so813334vcb.7        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Tue, 07 May 2013 11:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=google.com; s=20120113;        h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id         :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state;        bh=N6HRjeOlqqufjuHq95H9tA44joI+pRUiPoh2aA8gQOo=;        b=kbFnIvmp00DA4ZDmP7C4ot+3qeuvNQkh0Lh+jon9PZGmzJrzv8PICS572wTmj9FxvS         lnNzMlxYR+jpVpcxfttY9m1jS4558LzweasCyAKLIhxBx9zzwXZN8ObFxgYnJSx2O44B         H6KNcVTXdNTytiIfrbFboJ1EnrYxmu3gOCtwBzk/c8363QCFU2TdJu7N3CVGkDs/VTQH         UwuvmRQtaRBcrEgcRI4F9KqUAL3TISo4nxREWKyuBtkTFAicpTT9KyKH7AVp3okfG4Ka         NlX32XGqfQU80zAdKyLZrPWT/pzeoBpd1xFUfpQ9lJVFii5gnKVj36QFTQz11TqhPSWN         otTA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.42.7 with SMTP id q7mr2048368vce.69.1367950225322; Tue, 07 May 2013 11:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.173.7 with HTTP; Tue, 7 May 2013 11:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87sj1yu0hj.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
References: <CANFwon2V2vVADH89czoQjS+F=Uxsc5AgMAsQ3=d0nohc2EfBpA@mail.gmail.com>	<87zjwuv0qn.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<CANFwon1kWpR9mhGVbzf0qB4GqO89yN+Uj9jGUHpp2-kWWmFC4g@mail.gmail.com>	<87li87ll0r.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<CANFwon2jNppHObCEac=aSU6Uq6KLaoC5PGS8Vi3LawA+xzOJ=A@mail.gmail.com>	<87fvyd827o.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<CANFwon1m=hRBz22GLGa_CpWCYZ874K1P7mCEyYXHVc4T84U17A@mail.gmail.com>	<CADPb22Qz2tBWQmis=VbgXexNnYiqos2A1pBgeNN_NZtdQ=VtuQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CANFwon3HJye8SdLL8jV8H7-g-BipNON6+oS2p8J=QpnnrXbdFA@mail.gmail.com>	<83k3naeodd.fsf@gnu.org>	<CADPb22SD8H0HmopqHY7iFbFE+xFE2X092XgcBXeJ5CNm-W_Rgw@mail.gmail.com>	<87sj1yu0hj.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 18:10:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CADPb22QFRg8scQD_=Wx2e1DGjAakXY5f9kbfwo0UbZ6DwejqmA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] not trigger pagination with dprintf
From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>, 	gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkQW0IbHd51cN0/68kaGP6UmCp9iT8uauYwPnaSYY/1e+h6P7IVBhu7jULhYWX5pulHCe1RKhtRKhCz7CXMo7uJMXT7sOhW/TBCDJ+dbn+0/WoNIoHQufahAVJ0yhwTJVjksxsX6711IhXbJWwsUOhi85IGL9ysL2pqbX4P7Z9lQEYUu5SCCVlV4LNE8Bfp/aQC0XBIsmZG4Zd4YSgMHdZyxHHu5A==
X-SW-Source: 2013-05/txt/msg00256.txt.bz2

On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans <dje@google.com> writes:
>
> Doug> I'm kinda on the fence, and I'd like to hear what other GMs think.
>
> I still don't understand what is wrong with asking the user to disable
> pagination if that is what is desired.  Maybe the user actually wants
> pagination sometimes.

Me neither.
For the sake of discussion,
One could turn it around, however, and phrase the question as
"What should the default be while executing breakpoint commands?"