From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8283 invoked by alias); 8 Mar 2012 21:56:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 8274 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Mar 2012 21:56:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-vw0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-vw0-f41.google.com) (209.85.212.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 21:55:54 +0000 Received: by vbbey12 with SMTP id ey12so953005vbb.0 for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 13:55:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.93.77 with SMTP id cs13mr12728778vdb.71.1331243753977; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 13:55:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.93.77 with SMTP id cs13mr12728767vdb.71.1331243753889; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 13:55:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.187.12 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 13:55:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87aa3qn4h7.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> References: <20120305223429.GM2867@adacore.com> <20120307170940.GA22619@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120307171249.GB22619@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87aa3qn4h7.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 21:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] typedef-checking for CU relative vs. absolute offsets [Re: RFC: problem with DW_OP_GNU_deref_type and dwarf's get_base_type callback] From: Doug Evans To: Tom Tromey Cc: Jan Kratochvil , Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-System-Of-Record: true X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk92pRvfXqlZC+LmtQcgTTdDHcorBjyLbvvVrwS+m+x4vPpBuPVZzCOVJIeb7CH3ck/hCMY+TIeNXyFbJ9xpxkMVzdasoD37/I/7fEfFy6fw38LJ1UTOo1qtPOfDGKTDg/8feqoCOokaflcm0MUkK6LAst0xA== X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00293.txt.bz2 On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans writes: > > Doug> I'd rather just pick a better (clearer) name and be consistent. > > Could you say why? > I'm curious to know what you think the downside is. No point. Just go with what you want and I'll live with it.