From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-113028-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 12410 invoked by alias); 3 Jun 2014 20:49:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 12395 invoked by uid 89); 3 Jun 2014 20:49:41 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-ve0-f175.google.com
Received: from mail-ve0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-ve0-f175.google.com) (209.85.128.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 20:49:40 +0000
Received: by mail-ve0-f175.google.com with SMTP id jw12so7603514veb.20        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 13:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date         :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;        bh=2alzlLdCFc36piNojR1aJk9dZm79ExE2p4ACTPeVYh8=;        b=P1cdsEO1TLAiEvbUUujo52/x/dFP9TH0dWGLI3Q/CuKOTWZkr6y2dReh6sMeTuUU1t         omcabRwfLR4IbNjr4BUN7Tj//MTQ/ds5HOZ2IiJY7Xh2E2Etb3O6SY4lhvhXOaHk/Pjt         3xgqHRx5K2lWbFaaY12TtnxUboiU18FoKkyKTMDuh7JmvLdz9geeQHCYOnBbONU+Y9gN         f/1ra9OfqH/cf1YvEJ17hsC+v6bzhsDJ13v9l7qfDdyIyh76UjvW92zqEGPdjQ9pybL0         kBd1COUEEC1Xs86lks1FafgEIxXrNIhVhwROO4pUpyjjr6Z2ndMsOs2X2+K0lEPpgOnZ         o5aw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkaRbLKw4W3R+zPFTy7tnNVNExceuhjFFulhCi15dUZn519/mQx1k8SGE+e5OSFSeFEee01
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.92.135 with SMTP id r7mr39148166vcm.11.1401828578303; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 13:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.28.230 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 13:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <538DFEE0.6060802@redhat.com>
References: <yjt2k38yq2tj.fsf@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com>	<538DFEE0.6060802@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 20:49:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CADPb22QA00AWhNEoZ7nO-YNsTrth_ffdE5B0=H_0+S_gRi5K_w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clean up resize_section_table
From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg00100.txt.bz2

On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 06/03/2014 01:00 AM, Doug Evans wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> This patch is a simple cleanup to resize_section_table.
>> Some callers do a two-step dance to clear the table,
>> this replaces that with a new function that does what it says.
>>
>> Plus the argument "num_added" was a bit confusing so I renamed it.
>>
>> Regression tested on amd64-linux.
>
> Looks good to me.

Committed.
Thanks.