From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-112550-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 24992 invoked by alias); 19 May 2014 22:48:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 24977 invoked by uid 89); 19 May 2014 22:48:20 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-vc0-f176.google.com
Received: from mail-vc0-f176.google.com (HELO mail-vc0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 19 May 2014 22:48:18 +0000
Received: by mail-vc0-f176.google.com with SMTP id lg15so10327398vcb.21        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Mon, 19 May 2014 15:48:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date         :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;        bh=Q+oFCmFjpXejOTTZ3wv2PaHwaQ0afjOfBMPc7+QnJZE=;        b=LM3PWZ48iX9KkiEQEGuwaXujanobDH/FEH175b1uKWj8RljbZ76w92gsPFZBf9Y0Q5         BT9vmtApqL6ZSRwRbMzbugKem6HQJeigirkJyJorEILtmLbUVZnfLUyakFPSt0DbKMtS         w3/rlQEgmQ2dX6jo24re/R14EZMHvW+1dpvLQxbQflhZXg7NarGupjONP+DRuKpSWClQ         tP+US0Zau4P1BbTtXZF50IiQ7VzTTm1sK9lOUKc+hWb5MO0b1HUSI9vFcJ2+JMp1nxIv         iq/W0zMPp4WZnEeS2zlPsVNf3fJLfHYLi9vqk0rO/hSS6i6rMYhAvWrs3ORo3I58QZwi         k1/w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm38OQ1bLi130iLfCssEPnLT6vZd25Ppi2/uJRCKFJpdOtzZcsVvCAR3S+j2R67Rm32pKLw
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.47.201 with SMTP id o9mr150728vcf.65.1400539696766; Mon, 19 May 2014 15:48:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.28.230 with HTTP; Mon, 19 May 2014 15:48:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87r43py6g3.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
References: <20140319223004.14668.20989.stgit@host1.jankratochvil.net>	<20140319223014.14668.89536.stgit@host1.jankratochvil.net>	<m3pplbcqq3.fsf@redhat.com>	<20140518190534.GA19591@host2.jankratochvil.net>	<87r43py6g3.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 22:48:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CADPb22Q8UM8Mf2VvPkSS6G=6qrORVbHZX_0iKXjFCS1auvXGeA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] Move utility functions to common/
From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>, Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>, 	gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>, Aleksandar Ristovski <ARistovski@qnx.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00388.txt.bz2

On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
> Sergio> Can't this go in independently?  I think they are nice cleanups.
>
> Jan> I do not think it is right without the later parts of the patchset
> Jan> - code in gdb/common/ should be used by both gdb and gdbserver.
> Jan> Otherwise the code could remain in gdb/ only.
>
> If we had smaller files in common/ then we could put generically useful
> things there and not care so much, relying on the linker to eliminate
> bloat.

How much bloat are we talking about?

Plus there's always -ffunction-sections -Wl,-gc-sections.
I've been meaning to try it, if only to see what more can be removed from gdb.