From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21719 invoked by alias); 29 Sep 2011 12:33:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 21711 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Sep 2011 12:33:56 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-yw0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-yw0-f41.google.com) (209.85.213.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:33:38 +0000 Received: by ywe9 with SMTP id 9so585689ywe.0 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 05:33:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.180.168 with SMTP id j28mr28322210yhm.15.1317299617965; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 05:33:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.203.135 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 05:33:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201109291154.17349.pedro@codesourcery.com> References: <20110921190419.542512461A9@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> <201109291154.17349.pedro@codesourcery.com> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:41:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Rename "info definitions"? From: Matt Rice To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Doug Evans Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-09/txt/msg00527.txt.bz2 On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 3:54 AM, Pedro Alves wrote: > On Thursday 29 September 2011 03:13:58, Matt Rice wrote: >> +info macro [-all] [--] MACRO >> + =A0The info macro command has new options -all and --. The first or pr= inting >> + =A0all definitions of a macro. =A0The second for explicitly specifying= the end >> + =A0of arguments and the beginning of the macro name. > > Why do we need [--]? =A0MACROS can't start with `-', can they? not in cpp macros or m4 at least, lisp/scheme macros allow them i'm not sure what else may, I don't think any of the languages gdb currently supports allow it, but not positive I figured someone would complain but at least there'd be a patch in the archives...