From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-90151-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 26122 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2012 15:18:31 -0000
Received: (qmail 26111 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Apr 2012 15:18:29 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-yx0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-yx0-f169.google.com) (209.85.213.169)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 15:18:16 +0000
Received: by yenm8 with SMTP id m8so6272793yen.0        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:18:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.145.34 with SMTP id o22mr6503230yhj.7.1334935095578; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:18:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.115.200 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:18:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CACTLOFrp7Hg0ZG8h=NVkyjD-_400Zv=Zdrf2Lq_OW-ga=qiTbw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGyQ6gyuJ1oYBH3O5gzNc7Y7NK7AGC2F9a8Z3ts4dMm0GpVy0g@mail.gmail.com>	<831unms3jy.fsf@gnu.org>	<CAGyQ6gxxEeYeCKw_iHXh74Gg223GHxMoW=gvt9kU+ax396kKBQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAGyQ6gy+i4Tdh4zWDi_+cR+kw3MiU23BvWXgBqu5-+E48rjssw@mail.gmail.com>	<4F8F187D.3050402@redhat.com>	<878vhsojgd.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<CAGyQ6gzC_2hZfhBv4SQNGVem0bOLxMp+02Nmy=iwPtqNE=J8kg@mail.gmail.com>	<CADPb22TvvQDSA1EL4ydoZRGkKBm1kTCGcHyB2dc3X28p8XqyAg@mail.gmail.com>	<CAGyQ6gzK7FvC0EYvJD+DGnCRssbNREoSjdROfpbv0u22sBNOKQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CACTLOFrp7Hg0ZG8h=NVkyjD-_400Zv=Zdrf2Lq_OW-ga=qiTbw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 15:21:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CACTLOFoUecvSGOy-8AnOZSwWjMvMqUXTYuWTX5BPOh9kKx9Rrw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC - Python scripting] New methods Symtab.global_block and Symtab.static_block (docs included)
From: Matt Rice <ratmice@gmail.com>
To: Siva Chandra <sivachandra@google.com>
Cc: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>, 	Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon@redhat.com>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00686.txt.bz2

On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 4:43 AM, Matt Rice <ratmice@gmail.com> wrote:

> I can't find the specific comment I went looking for,
> which I recall as saying that sometimes it is a 'best guess'. =A0could
> be a figment of my imagination

Ahh, i remembered that this was the comment at the top of
enum minimal_symbol_type, which is likely to be completely unrelated
to the topic.