From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 49749 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2015 17:16:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 49739 invoked by uid 89); 4 Aug 2015 17:16:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-wi0-f172.google.com Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f172.google.com) (209.85.212.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 17:16:06 +0000 Received: by wicgj17 with SMTP id gj17so159779117wic.1 for ; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 10:16:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.79.132 with SMTP id j4mr9705148wix.87.1438708563619; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 10:16:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.27.11.33 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 10:16:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150804170710.GF4777@adacore.com> References: <20150804170710.GF4777@adacore.com> Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 17:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR 18669: Remove use of strtod in libiberty/d-demangle.c From: Iain Buclaw To: Joel Brobecker Cc: GDB Patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg00092.txt.bz2 On 4 August 2015 at 19:07, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> Also submitted to upstream GCC. >> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-08/msg00192.html >> >> Have tested this against the gdb dlang testsuite and observed no >> failing tests as a result. >> >> Regards >> Iain. > >> 2015-08-04 Iain Buclaw >> >> * d-demangle.c (dlang_parse_real): Remove call to strtod. >> (strtod): Remove declaration. >> * testsuite/d-demangle-expected: Update float and complex literal >> tests to check correct hexadecimal demangling. > > GCC is the master, so you can (in fact, should!) update the binutils-gdb > copy as soon as the patch is approved on the GCC side. > > Thank you, > -- > Joel By the way, would this also be a candidate for the 7.10 branch? Assume that upstream GCC respond in a timely manner. :-) Regards Iain