From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8253 invoked by alias); 2 Jan 2012 10:04:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 8244 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Jan 2012 10:04:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,URIBL_BLACK X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-iy0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-iy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.210.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 10:03:48 +0000 Received: by iacb35 with SMTP id b35so31758076iac.0 for ; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 02:03:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.181.136 with SMTP id dw8mr56600401igc.6.1325498628211; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 02:03:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.91.81 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Jan 2012 02:03:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20111229121739.GU23376@adacore.com> References: <20111229121739.GU23376@adacore.com> From: Luca Pizzamiglio Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 10:04:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: wrong bfd recognized To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00025.txt.bz2 Hi Joel, sorry for the confusion, I'm not used to write this kind of ChangeLog entry. My fault. 2012-01-02 Luca Pizzamiglio * gdb/configure.ac (LDFLAGS in ELF support's check): changing path priority in LDFLAGS LDFLAGS is redefined putting an external-defined value at the end. I hope that works now! This rules doesn't fit well with autoconf files :) Feel free to modify it, if it's still wrong. thanks for the support Luca On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Joel Brobecker wro= te: > Luca > >> > Could you write a ChangeLog entry for your patch? >> > I will put it in. > [...] >> Ok. A possible entry could be: >> >> improved bfd local static library detection in the configure script > > Unfortunately, this is not what a ChangeLog entry should look like. > I suspect you thought that we were asking for some text to be used > as revision history? =A0Here is what a ChangeLog entry looks like: > > 2011-12-27 =A0Doug Evans =A0 > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* dwarf2read.c (struct dwarf2_cu): Delete members first_fn= , last_fn, > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0cached_fn. > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(struct function_range): Delete. > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(initialize_cu_func_list, add_to_cu_func_list): Delete. = =A0All callers > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0updated. > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(check_cu_functions): Ditto. > > You can have a look at the couple of sections that explain ChangeLogs > in the GNU Coding Standards (the link brings you directly to the > relevant section): > > =A0 =A0http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/standards.html#Change-Logs > > Please let me know if you have any problems creating one and I will > write it for you (this time!). > > -- > Joel