From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6477 invoked by alias); 22 Oct 2014 05:39:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 6465 invoked by uid 89); 22 Oct 2014 05:39:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-wg0-f49.google.com Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com (HELO mail-wg0-f49.google.com) (74.125.82.49) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 05:39:54 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id x12so2960592wgg.32 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 22:39:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=eltZPCkkf9VvhVNdLN7VWiZ6+sSwgl7ZYpDMfaAXIRY=; b=Bdnz/eWiRqq9Ywq8u6rwze3igzgHofZapydrl6FVGUw+0jQYMWa1TLTjoxu7GkYiTZ nNecTN0wjHXIco38ExGicmsJ+tZ6CpfZVRRGrHzwr7saexrVAIxL9FiHDPPskUkVp9y6 tEWwXldC46aowWcHzqgASyjsV7JrcVYmGtn7pcywTQCcBx73RDIJPrGykiQ3lo5wOiUy piVHLzV+T8B1S/LS8qB0eOTLc37nGPn/sJr4XYYvhNaL+CyJhjuTxXaXdR0SxA+zGtpV yORJi+UPkfsNZKNnfkM8Rajt7eiMCuGHTZhBtkFOD2Mw0rSOCQAP2tavjySwFon8+QMp Z3Ag== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm5R7LSF47mwPsngOgiNXhb2+d3Ke4ru564W7tUtERC8l1IZIcrzWkx32SftGLcyRPXNW1l MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.188.229 with SMTP id gd5mr35520697wic.25.1413956390587; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 22:39:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.77.11 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 22:39:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8761fdkh8q.fsf@codesourcery.com> References: <1413853021-4393-1-git-send-email-victor.kamensky@linaro.org> <8761fdkh8q.fsf@codesourcery.com> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 05:39:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] arm: set of big endian related fixes for armeb (v7) From: Victor Kamensky To: Yao Qi Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00564.txt.bz2 Hi Yao, Thank you for your help and attention! Please see response inline. On 21 October 2014 00:35, Yao Qi wrote: > Victor Kamensky writes: > >> Note there are several failures remain that are not addressed by this >> series. I.e valgrind related test cases all failed, because valgrind does >> not support armeb target. There are other failures in a bit obscure >> places like gdb.dwarf2/implptrpiece.exp, gdb.python/py-value-cc.exp, >> but over all number of passes/failures significantly improved in armeb >> case. > > Out of my curiosity, do you plan to address the rest of fails you > mentioned above? Not sure yet. Maybe on the second pass. Currently I am working on aarch64 BE vs LE gdb testsuite result differences. There are few issues in BE aarch64 case that affect gdb functionality visible to gdb user. I believe that remaining differences in ARM V7 BE test results most likely are issues in test cases. And I am not sure whether it is more general BE vs LE issues. I would probably give it a spin on BE ppc and see how tests in question behave there. Problems related to valgrind will not be addressed any time soon. It seems it is huge thing to make valgrind to work in ARM V7 BE case. Thanks, Victor > -- > Yao (=E9=BD=90=E5=B0=A7)