From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-82045-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 15600 invoked by alias); 5 Jul 2011 08:37:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 15423 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Jul 2011 08:37:27 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-wy0-f169.google.com) (74.125.82.169)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 08:37:12 +0000
Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so4697502wyg.0        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 01:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.229.222 with SMTP id h72mr6103788weq.34.1309855031106; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 01:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.159.197 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 01:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20110704205101.GU2407@adacore.com>
References: <BANLkTinD+9_Mkug8o2VhZ03L6XSriL_RKQ@mail.gmail.com>	<m3oc1kfheh.fsf@redhat.com>	<20110627160029.GF20676@adacore.com>	<m3sjqt67pe.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<m3mxh1oa8a.fsf@redhat.com>	<CAA18ubJ10sh3pPDLp4V44qY6r6hLU9RqyDi62KuAAtfXJY7Oug@mail.gmail.com>	<834o33qlm9.fsf@gnu.org>	<CAA18ubJZK7w51Bmwvy7xYXPvHf7e=bbRbdBOqNvZA-PrXJpUsA@mail.gmail.com>	<E1Qdhn8-0000fE-TK@fencepost.gnu.org>	<20110704205101.GU2407@adacore.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 08:38:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAA18ubLtkxJt_OJFHpqSSc-H_Z=x18NYOpWFz0uaTSWbwaYEzw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] GDB 7.2: new feature for "backtrace" that cuts path to file (remain filename)
From: iam ahal <hal9000ed2k@gmail.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, pmuldoon@redhat.com, tromey@redhat.com, 	gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00140.txt.bz2

On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> wrote:
> However, I'm more concerned about the fact that this is implemented as an option
> of the backtrace argument rather than as a setting. Those of us who
> have expressed an opinion seem to clearly favor the user of a setting.
> Now, to find an appropriate name for that setting...

You mean 'set' command (e.g. 'set bt-display-only-basename')?
I can do this if necessary.