From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26947 invoked by alias); 2 Dec 2012 16:39:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 26805 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Dec 2012 16:39:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-vb0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-vb0-f41.google.com) (209.85.212.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 16:39:00 +0000 Received: by mail-vb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id l22so1096805vbn.0 for ; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 08:38:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.90.241 with SMTP id bz17mr5608070vdb.40.1354466339478; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 08:38:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.255.98 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 08:38:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20121201171439.GA20612@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20121130185653.GA15394@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20121201171439.GA20612@host2.jankratochvil.net> Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 16:39:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [patchv2] GDB 7.2: new feature for "backtrace" that cuts path to file (remain filename) From: iam ahal To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00012.txt.bz2 Hi Jan, At first glance, it looks that the new patch has all the options like my original patch. As I understand the default "as-recorded" was replaced by "relative", so it looks good for me. Thank you. With best regards, ~Eldar On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > Hi Eldar, > > On Sat, 01 Dec 2012 00:09:28 +0100, iam ahal wrote: >> Is this new patch (with your and my code) already committed to repository? > > no. (It would be marked as [commit] and some such wording would be there.) > It is sent for a possible new review/comments although I do not expect any > real changes in this part as it has been already thoroughly discussed before. > > But I would like your opinion whether this patch provides all the options like > your original patch. One cannot directly compared it as the > directories/filenames situation is now changed after you apply beforehand the > patch: > [patch] Limit DW_AT_comp_dir workaround only for gcc<=4.2 > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-11/msg00948.html > Message-ID: <20121130173946.GA12865@host2.jankratochvil.net> > > Thanks, > Jan