On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> But a larger concern is that GNU coding standards frown on using
> "path" when you really mean "file name".  So I think we should rename
> the option "basename" and the documentation should say
>
>  Same as @code{backtrace}, but print only the basename of the file.

Fixed. New doc's patch in attachment. What's about backtrace's
argument name "nopath"?

> This is non-portable (directory separator is not guaranteed to be
> '/'), you need to use lbasename instead.

Fixed. Patch in attachment.