From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14016 invoked by alias); 30 May 2011 06:31:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 14006 invoked by uid 22791); 30 May 2011 06:31:56 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mailrelay001.isp.belgacom.be (HELO mailrelay001.isp.belgacom.be) (195.238.6.51) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 06:31:42 +0000 X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgUFAAk5401tgHac/2dsb2JhbABVhEmFTpwSeIhqB6xqj2AOgR2DbIEHBJ9r Received: from 156.118-128-109.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO soleil) ([109.128.118.156]) by relay.skynet.be with SMTP; 30 May 2011 08:31:40 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Philippe Waroquiers" To: "Yao Qi" , References: <4DDF196F.5010202@codesourcery.com> <201105271858.53944.pedro@codesourcery.com> <4DE317B1.1040200@codesourcery.com> <4DE32F7B.6090802@codesourcery.com> Subject: Re: ping: Re: PATCH : allow to set length of hw watchpoints (e.g. for Valgrind gdbserver) Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 06:31:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00673.txt.bz2 > Philippe, > As maintainers pointed out, adding a new target `remote-valgrind' is not > the right way to go, and I am not strongly against your patch, please > ignore my last comment on adding a new target. Effectively, a new target is not the right way to go. But there are still two points worth discussing: * the bug in the current x86 gdbserver * and what behaviour is desired for "too long" watchpoints that can't be placed as hw watchpoints. Philippe