From: Patrick Palka <patrick@parcs.ath.cx>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add option to remove duplicate command history entries
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 14:30:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+C-WL9M-qdL+_CkPPr6edmwxubcPKUve+k_XykYKex7-txOsQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <558D5F26.4040401@redhat.com>
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 06/20/2015 12:33 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
>
>> index c9a532a..c5885eb 100644
>> --- a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
>> +++ b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
>> @@ -22644,6 +22644,21 @@ to 256 if this variable is not set. Non-numeric values of @env{GDBHISTSIZE}
>> are ignored. If @var{size} is @code{unlimited} or if @env{GDBHISTSIZE} is
>> either a negative number or the empty string, then the number of commands
>> @value{GDBN} keeps in the history list is unlimited.
>> +
>> +@cindex remove duplicate history
>> +@kindex set history remove-duplicates
>> +@item set history remove-duplicates @var{size}
>> +@itemx set history remove-duplicates unlimited
>> +Control the removal of duplicate history entries in the command history list.
>> +If @var{size} is non-zero, @value{GDBN} will look back at the last @var{size}
>
> Somehow, "size" here sounds a bit confusing to me. This not about
> that size of the duplicates. :-) And it's not about when the history
> gets to a certain size either. I'd suggest s/size/count/, or s/size/lookbehind/
> or some such.
Ah yeah, I had already changed that variable name locally to "count".
>
>> +history entries and remove the first entry that is a duplicate of the current
>> +entry being added to the command history list. If @var{size} is
>> +@code{unlimited} then this lookbehind is unbounded. If @var{size} is 0, then
>> +removal of duplicate history entries is disabled.
>> +
>> +Only history entries added during the current session are considered for
>> +removal. This option is set to 0 by default.
>> +
>
>
>
>> +proc check_prev_history_entry { entry { test_suffix "" } } {
>> + set test "history entry is $entry"
>> + if { $test_suffix != "" } {
>> + append test " $test_suffix"
>> + }
>> +
>> + # Send ^P followed by ^L.
>> + send_gdb "\x10\x0c"
>
> I have a feeling this may cause problems, but we'll see.
Hopefully not because I copied this "technique" of traversing through
history from readline.exp. I considered using looking at the output
of "show commands" but doing ^P seems easier and more directly tests
the code paths we want to test.
>
>> +
>> + gdb_expect {
>> + -re $entry {
>> + pass $test
>> + }
>> + timeout {
>> + fail $test
>> + }
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +# By default the option is set to 0.
>> +gdb_exit
>> +gdb_start
>> +gdb_test "show history remove-duplicates" "is 0\\."
>> +
>> +# Test the "unlimited" setting.
>> +with_test_prefix "remove-duplicates=unlimited" {
>> + gdb_exit
>> + gdb_start
>> + gdb_test "set history remove-duplicates unlimited"
>> +
>> + gdb_test "print 0"
>> + gdb_test "print 1"
>> + gdb_test "print 2"
>> + gdb_test "print 1"
>> + gdb_test "print 1"
>> + gdb_test "print 2"
>> + gdb_test "print 3"
>> + gdb_test "print 3"
>> + gdb_test "print 4"
>> + gdb_test "print 1"
>> + gdb_test "print 2"
>> + gdb_test "print 3"
>> + gdb_test "print 4"
>
> Duplicate test names here. This should catch all:
I could use some kind of loop over a list here I think, prefixing each
test name with the index of the list.
>
> $ make check RUNTESTFLAGS="history-duplicates.exp"
> $ grep "PASS" testsuite/gdb.sum | sort | uniq -c | sort -n
>
> Otherwise this looks good to me.
Thanks a lot for reviewing!
>
> Thanks,
> Pedro Alves
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-26 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-04 16:22 Patrick Palka
2015-06-04 16:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-06-04 18:54 ` Patrick Palka
2015-06-04 19:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-06-09 18:10 ` Pedro Alves
2015-06-09 18:41 ` Patrick Palka
2015-06-10 15:12 ` Pedro Alves
2015-06-19 23:33 ` Patrick Palka
2015-06-20 6:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-06-26 13:35 ` Patrick Palka
2015-06-26 14:18 ` Pedro Alves
2015-06-26 14:30 ` Patrick Palka [this message]
2015-06-26 14:50 ` Pedro Alves
2015-06-26 15:12 ` Patrick Palka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+C-WL9M-qdL+_CkPPr6edmwxubcPKUve+k_XykYKex7-txOsQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=patrick@parcs.ath.cx \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox