From: Patrick Palka <patrick@parcs.ath.cx>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Append to input history file instead of overwriting it
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 15:48:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+C-WL88pk1tnTHp1FS_LMhNXiypmWify75d2eJW4w+2aLjRTA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83wq4u63wu.fsf@gnu.org>
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> From: Patrick Palka <patrick@parcs.ath.cx>
>> Cc: Patrick Palka <patrick@parcs.ath.cx>
>> Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 10:18:28 -0500
>>
>> + local_history_filename = xstrprintf ("%s.%d", history_filename, getpid ());
>> + old_chain = make_cleanup (xfree, local_history_filename);
>> +
>> + ret = rename (history_filename, local_history_filename);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + {
>> + /* If the rename failed then either the global history file never existed
>> + in the first place or another GDB process is currently appending to it
>> + (and has thus temporarily renamed it). Since we can't distinguish
>> + between these two cases, we have to conservatively assume the first
>> + case and therefore must write out (not append) our known history to
>> + our local history file and try to move it back anyway. Otherwise a
>> + global history file would never get created! */
>> + write_history (local_history_filename);
>> + }
>> + else
>> + {
>> + append_history (command_count, local_history_filename);
>> + history_truncate_file (local_history_filename, history_max_entries);
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = rename (local_history_filename, history_filename);
>> + saved_errno = errno;
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + warning (_("Could not rename %s to %s: error %d"),
>> + local_history_filename, history_filename, saved_errno);
>> +
>> + do_cleanups (old_chain);
>
> On Windows, a call to 'rename' fails if the destination already
> exists. Does the logic here cope with that?
Hmm, the logic does not really cope with Windows' behavior here,
because the above warning should only get emitted for unexpected
failures. So I suppose we should only emit the above warning if errno
!= EBUSY (perhaps only on Windows systems)?
>
> Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-10 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-29 2:01 Patrick Palka
2014-12-01 20:50 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2014-12-04 16:18 ` Pedro Alves
2014-12-05 0:19 ` Patrick Palka
2014-12-05 10:45 ` Pedro Alves
2014-12-05 14:11 ` Patrick Palka
2014-12-10 16:54 ` Pedro Alves
2014-12-10 17:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-12-10 17:23 ` Pedro Alves
2015-01-10 14:10 ` Patrick Palka
2015-01-10 15:16 ` Patrick Palka
2015-01-10 15:18 ` Patrick Palka
2015-01-10 15:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-10 15:48 ` Patrick Palka [this message]
2015-01-10 16:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-10 16:18 ` Patrick Palka
2015-01-10 16:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-10 18:17 ` Patrick Palka
2015-01-10 18:46 ` Patrick Palka
2015-01-12 19:05 ` Pedro Alves
2015-01-12 22:56 ` Patrick Palka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+C-WL88pk1tnTHp1FS_LMhNXiypmWify75d2eJW4w+2aLjRTA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=patrick@parcs.ath.cx \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox