Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Palka <patrick@parcs.ath.cx>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Fix gdb.base/gdbinit-history.exp when HISTSIZE is set in the environment (Re: [PATCH] [COMMITTED] Fix PR gdb/17820)
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 21:43:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+C-WL-bLmb4mkrOM-J9WnEPEW7TrmykBwA=FwW4rRqPWzUm3g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55563C0D.9010903@redhat.com>

On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 05/15/2015 06:03 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
>> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> +    if {$have_old_histsize} {
>>> +       set env(HISTSIZE) $old_histsize
>>> +    }
>>
>> Why not change this predicate to
>>
>>      if [info exists old_histsize]
>>
>> to obviate the need for $have_old_histsize altogether?
>
> Yeah, "info exists" is ok since this is local scope; I was worrying
> that the code ends up copied elsewhere to global context, and
> then the "info exists" would be the wrong thing to use, considering
> e.g., [1] and [2].  Maybe I'm worrying too much.  But how about instead
> simply saving/restoring the whole env array, like in the updated
> patch below, which sidesteps that issue?

What a neat language (TCL).

Both the original approach (with $have_old_histsize) and this one look
fine by me.


  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-15 21:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-13 13:29 [PATCH] [COMMITTED] Fix PR gdb/17820 Patrick Palka
2015-05-15 16:05 ` Pedro Alves
2015-05-15 17:04   ` Patrick Palka
2015-05-15 18:33     ` [PATCH v2] Fix gdb.base/gdbinit-history.exp when HISTSIZE is set in the environment (Re: [PATCH] [COMMITTED] Fix PR gdb/17820) Pedro Alves
2015-05-15 21:43       ` Patrick Palka [this message]
2015-05-19  9:59         ` Pedro Alves
2015-05-15 17:10   ` [PATCH] [COMMITTED] Fix PR gdb/17820 Patrick Palka
2015-05-15 17:17     ` Pedro Alves
2015-05-15 17:27       ` Patrick Palka
2015-05-15 17:48         ` Pedro Alves
2015-05-15 21:22           ` Patrick Palka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CA+C-WL-bLmb4mkrOM-J9WnEPEW7TrmykBwA=FwW4rRqPWzUm3g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=patrick@parcs.ath.cx \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox