From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-122969-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 7336 invoked by alias); 16 May 2015 15:50:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 7327 invoked by uid 89); 16 May 2015 15:50:38 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-ob0-f173.google.com
Received: from mail-ob0-f173.google.com (HELO mail-ob0-f173.google.com) (209.85.214.173) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sat, 16 May 2015 15:50:36 +0000
Received: by obbkp3 with SMTP id kp3so97339885obb.3        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Sat, 16 May 2015 08:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date         :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;        bh=miKMuYZAqJWjbds/aUFj1s+MDWRyqt/yCM7fooRx0+A=;        b=l48LqUSDcXE97/rZeO+kJ9Y7/ZzMoACn9ZhrG8WH4KQpOdHzQsB4fEWLo0w+7yXF0X         git3Ae/41altKmMxrmRna1DR9P3t1KyMKVtqATK+QJMh+0BFT6Ny9FoJ9BIr4OKPruOc         94s7Ed5LKuhKo6pkbC38hnJcQwibBsksUuJMtzY9kCC1Rx4xM7Ci/xYd2eeoz86SZ8bS         aBuVpiHkNN09N/ZDTLClIesX+kSV0SukDLwa4ZzBMkOW3NKGWVnCSpKFCRpWrb+SBW+e         wvKDWRx0902SmgzqRHTlCFUpC/Ntve4WbCjA0eUAzAHgB156aEOIokNcQT0OIZ2JGnSA         TiSQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlnoNfbN2zjfCRFMqn4qc3vfL4QqtC7N+CQkk5dsH5BIeCr9DMDfoxuhZ9fWT4aWE4zcEj5
X-Received: by 10.202.54.3 with SMTP id d3mr12260256oia.103.1431791435139; Sat, 16 May 2015 08:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.243.232 with HTTP; Sat, 16 May 2015 08:50:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20150516152514.GA12510@host1.jankratochvil.net>
References: <1431562331-20448-1-git-send-email-patrick@parcs.ath.cx> <CADPb22RQi=S3ygBGL-b5+XD=Eyz+aKeQXmjE+5iSiazA-=4M7Q@mail.gmail.com> <CA+C-WL9Nqa7G4Wh1kszePEjQ5HwFNT5MsX+J5GFCswNDY1GPVQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADPb22SQpS1qwJ-uWQ+=JC-Z62YQBY9xGjxMRpx-2oEQHMuyiA@mail.gmail.com> <20150516152514.GA12510@host1.jankratochvil.net>
From: Patrick Palka <patrick@parcs.ath.cx>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 15:50:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CA+C-WL-A46fNMKtMKG5XfoHjESfbh+_ss0BncdB+GK9hEFsRvA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Sync readline to version 6.3 patchlevel 8
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>, gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00441.txt.bz2

On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Jan Kratochvil
<jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 16 May 2015 17:23:23 +0200, Doug Evans wrote:
>> Another thought is that IWBN if the reapplication of local patches was
>> a separate commit.
>
> IIUC this would break git bisect.

Unless the local patch fixes a major issue (or perhaps a build error),
I don't think separately reapplying local patches would "break" git
bisect but it would possibly introduce temporary readline-related
testsuite regressions which are not relevant unless you're already
bisecting a readline-related issue.  I haven't used git bisect so I
may be wrong...  But if that's the case then IMO it's worth the
"breakage".