From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14181 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2009 08:15:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 14030 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jul 2009 08:15:50 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (212.99.106.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 08:15:44 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8576290030; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 10:15:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wuGhA-3Aza+k; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 10:15:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ulanbator.act-europe.fr (ulanbator.act-europe.fr [10.10.1.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B168290016; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 10:15:41 +0200 (CEST) Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Message-Id: From: Tristan Gingold To: Mark Kettenis In-Reply-To: <200907061016.n66AGPFQ000907@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Subject: Re: [RFA Darwin]: Add push_dummy_call for i386 Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 08:15:00 -0000 References: <20090703155152.GA76089@ulanbator.act-europe.fr> <200907031648.n63Gm7Wn019605@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <200907061016.n66AGPFQ000907@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00177.txt.bz2 On Jul 6, 2009, at 12:16 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote: >> I quoted LowLevelABI.pdf. What is wrong in this sentence ? (Keep >> in mind that I am not a native english speaker!) > > Heh well, if it is a quotation, better not change it. But perhaps the > comment should indicate this is a quotation from the ABI document? I propose this: /* According to Mac OS X ABI document (passing arguments): 6. The caller places 64-bit vectors (__m64) on the parameter area, aligned to 8-byte boundaries. 7. [...] The caller aligns 128-bit vectors in the parameter area to 16-byte boundaries. */ Is it OK with that change (or do you prefer to review the whole patch again) ? Tristan.