From: Alan Hayward via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
To: Luis Machado <luis.machado@linaro.org>
Cc: nd <nd@arm.com>,
"gdb-patches\\@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][AArch64] SVE/FPSIMD fixup for big endian
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 17:38:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C44EA479-F3B1-4D1F-B2D4-A91E8349080E@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <791ee593-8d5b-2eec-17c8-fa34a3809d12@linaro.org>
> On 1 Dec 2020, at 12:19, Luis Machado <luis.machado@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> On 12/1/20 8:28 AM, Alan Hayward wrote:
>>> On 30 Nov 2020, at 18:55, Luis Machado <luis.machado@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> The FPSIMD dump in signal frames and ptrace FPSIMD dump in the SVE context
>>> structure follows the target endianness, whereas the SVE dumps are
>>> endianness-independent (LE).
>>>
>>> Therefore, when the system is in BE mode, we need to reverse the bytes
>>> for the FPSIMD data.
>>>
>>> Given the V registers are larger than 64-bit, I've added a way for value
>>> bytes to be set, as opposed to passing a 64-bit fixed quantity. This fits
>>> nicely with the unwinding *_got_bytes function and makes the trad-frame
>>> more flexible and capable of saving larger registers.
>>>
>>> The memory for the bytes is allocated via the frame obstack, so it gets freed
>>> after we're done inspecting the frame.
>>>
>>> gdb/ChangeLog:
>>>
>>> YYYY-MM-DD Luis Machado <luis.machado@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> * aarch64-linux-tdep.c (aarch64_linux_restore_vreg) New function.
>>> (aarch64_linux_sigframe_init): Call aarch64_linux_restore_vreg.
>>> * nat/aarch64-sve-linux-ptrace.c: Include endian.h.
>>> (aarch64_maybe_swab128): New function.
>>> (aarch64_sve_regs_copy_to_reg_buf)
>>> (aarch64_sve_regs_copy_from_reg_buf): Adjust FPSIMD entries.
>>> * trad-frame.c (trad_frame_reset_saved_regs): Initialize
>>> the data field.
>>> (TF_REG_VALUE_BYTES): New enum value.
>>> (trad_frame_value_bytes_p): New function.
>>> (trad_frame_set_value_bytes): New function.
>>> (trad_frame_set_reg_value_bytes): New function.
>>> (trad_frame_get_prev_register): Handle register values saved as bytes.
>>> * trad-frame.h (trad_frame_set_reg_value_bytes): New prototype.
>>> (struct trad_frame_saved_reg) <data>: New field.
>>> (trad_frame_set_value_bytes): New prototype.
>>> (trad_frame_value_bytes_p): New prototype.
>>> ---
>>> gdb/aarch64-linux-tdep.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>> gdb/nat/aarch64-sve-linux-ptrace.c | 57 +++++++++++++-
>>> gdb/trad-frame.c | 46 +++++++++++-
>>> gdb/trad-frame.h | 19 +++++
>>> 4 files changed, 213 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/gdb/aarch64-linux-tdep.c b/gdb/aarch64-linux-tdep.c
>>> index c9898bdafd..108f96be71 100644
>>> --- a/gdb/aarch64-linux-tdep.c
>>> +++ b/gdb/aarch64-linux-tdep.c
>>> @@ -180,6 +180,94 @@ read_aarch64_ctx (CORE_ADDR ctx_addr, enum bfd_endian byte_order,
>>> return magic;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +/* Given CACHE, use the trad_frame* functions to restore the FPSIMD
>>> + registers from a signal frame.
>>> +
>>> + VREG_NUM is the number of the V register being restored, OFFSET is the
>>> + address containing the register value, BYTE_ORDER is the endianness and
>>> + HAS_SVE tells us if we have a valid SVE context or not. */
>>> +
>>> +static void
>>> +aarch64_linux_restore_vreg (struct trad_frame_cache *cache, int num_regs,
>>> + int vreg_num, CORE_ADDR offset,
>>> + enum bfd_endian byte_order, bool has_sve)
>>> +{
>>> + /* WARNING: SIMD state is laid out in memory in target-endian format, while
>>> + SVE state is laid out in an endianness-independent format (LE).
>>> +
>>> + So we have a couple cases to consider:
>>> +
>>> + 1 - If the target is big endian, then SIMD state is big endian,
>>> + requiring a byteswap.
>>> +
>>> + 2 - If the target is little endian, then SIMD state is little endian,
>>> + which matches the SVE format, so no byteswap is needed. */
>>> +
>> With this function, we are only handling FPSIMD values, so no need to mention SVE.
>> As it is now, it makes the has_sve parts confusing because they are being treated
>> the same as the rest of the fpsimd.
>
> Though we are handling FPSIMD, we still need to set at least one SVE pseudo-register (AARCH64_SVE_V0_REGNUM), hence why I decided to keep the warning. It is not really a SVE register, but a pseudo-register of the FPSIMD V register.
>
> Do you still want to remove the SVE references in the warning?
For this function, I would say remove the SVE comment, as everything in the function
is being treated in the same way. But I’m not overly hung up on it.
>
> What is the difference between AARCH64_SVE_V0_REGNUM and AARCH64_V0_REGNUM?
Z,V,Q,D,S,H,B registers all overlap with each other. It’s the same register,
just a different size.
In the tdep, when we only have neon, V is the real register, and Q,D,S,H,B are pseudos.
Then when we have sve, Z is the real register, and V,Q,D,S,H,B are pseudos.
AARCH64_SVE_Z0_REGNUM == AARCH64_V0_REGNUM.
And then AARCH64_SVE_V0_REGNUM represents the regnum of the V0 pseudo register
when SVE is enabled.
ARCH64_SVE_V0_REGNUM == AARCH64_B0_REGNUM + 32
Maybe eventually this should be updated to be similar to pauth. Have a single define
which requires a v0_reg_base value in the tdep.
>
>> The same comment is fine when used elsewhere in the patch.
>>> + if (byte_order == BFD_ENDIAN_BIG)
>>> + {
>>> + gdb_byte buf[V_REGISTER_SIZE];
>>> +
>>> + if (target_read_memory (offset, buf, V_REGISTER_SIZE) != 0)
>>> + {
>>> + size_t size = V_REGISTER_SIZE/2;
>>> +
>>> + /* Read the two halves of the V register in reverse byte order. */
>>> + CORE_ADDR u64 = extract_unsigned_integer (buf, size,
>>> + byte_order);
>>> + CORE_ADDR l64 = extract_unsigned_integer (buf + size, size,
>>> + byte_order);
>>> +
>>> + /* Copy the reversed bytes to the buffer. */
>>> + store_unsigned_integer (buf, size, BFD_ENDIAN_LITTLE, l64);
>>> + store_unsigned_integer (buf + size , size, BFD_ENDIAN_LITTLE, u64);
>>> +
>>> + /* Now we can store the correct bytes for the V register. */
>>> + trad_frame_set_reg_value_bytes (cache, AARCH64_V0_REGNUM + vreg_num,
>>> + buf, V_REGISTER_SIZE);
>>> + trad_frame_set_reg_value_bytes (cache,
>>> + num_regs + AARCH64_Q0_REGNUM
>>> + + vreg_num, buf, Q_REGISTER_SIZE);
>>> + trad_frame_set_reg_value_bytes (cache,
>>> + num_regs + AARCH64_D0_REGNUM
>>> + + vreg_num, buf, D_REGISTER_SIZE);
>>> + trad_frame_set_reg_value_bytes (cache,
>>> + num_regs + AARCH64_S0_REGNUM
>>> + + vreg_num, buf, S_REGISTER_SIZE);
>>> + trad_frame_set_reg_value_bytes (cache,
>>> + num_regs + AARCH64_H0_REGNUM
>>> + + vreg_num, buf, H_REGISTER_SIZE);
>>> + trad_frame_set_reg_value_bytes (cache,
>>> + num_regs + AARCH64_B0_REGNUM
>>> + + vreg_num, buf, B_REGISTER_SIZE);
>>> +
>>> + if (has_sve)
>>> + trad_frame_set_reg_value_bytes (cache,
>>> + num_regs + AARCH64_SVE_V0_REGNUM
>>> + + vreg_num, buf, V_REGISTER_SIZE);
>>> + }
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* Little endian, just point at the address containing the register
>>> + value. */
>>> + trad_frame_set_reg_addr (cache, AARCH64_V0_REGNUM + vreg_num, offset);
>>> + trad_frame_set_reg_addr (cache, num_regs + AARCH64_Q0_REGNUM + vreg_num,
>>> + offset);
>>> + trad_frame_set_reg_addr (cache, num_regs + AARCH64_D0_REGNUM + vreg_num,
>>> + offset);
>>> + trad_frame_set_reg_addr (cache, num_regs + AARCH64_S0_REGNUM + vreg_num,
>>> + offset);
>>> + trad_frame_set_reg_addr (cache, num_regs + AARCH64_H0_REGNUM + vreg_num,
>>> + offset);
>>> + trad_frame_set_reg_addr (cache, num_regs + AARCH64_B0_REGNUM + vreg_num,
>>> + offset);
>>> +
>>> + if (has_sve)
>>> + trad_frame_set_reg_addr (cache, num_regs + AARCH64_SVE_V0_REGNUM
>>> + + vreg_num, offset);
>>> +
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> /* Implement the "init" method of struct tramp_frame. */
>>>
>>> static void
>>> @@ -332,27 +420,16 @@ aarch64_linux_sigframe_init (const struct tramp_frame *self,
>>>
>>> /* If there was no SVE section then set up the V registers. */
>>> if (sve_regs == 0)
>>> - for (int i = 0; i < 32; i++)
>>> - {
>>> - CORE_ADDR offset = (fpsimd + AARCH64_FPSIMD_V0_OFFSET
>>> + {
>>> + for (int i = 0; i < 32; i++)
>>> + {
>>> + CORE_ADDR offset = (fpsimd + AARCH64_FPSIMD_V0_OFFSET
>>> + (i * AARCH64_FPSIMD_VREG_SIZE));
>>>
>>> - trad_frame_set_reg_addr (this_cache, AARCH64_V0_REGNUM + i, offset);
>>> - trad_frame_set_reg_addr (this_cache,
>>> - num_regs + AARCH64_Q0_REGNUM + i, offset);
>>> - trad_frame_set_reg_addr (this_cache,
>>> - num_regs + AARCH64_D0_REGNUM + i, offset);
>>> - trad_frame_set_reg_addr (this_cache,
>>> - num_regs + AARCH64_S0_REGNUM + i, offset);
>>> - trad_frame_set_reg_addr (this_cache,
>>> - num_regs + AARCH64_H0_REGNUM + i, offset);
>>> - trad_frame_set_reg_addr (this_cache,
>>> - num_regs + AARCH64_B0_REGNUM + i, offset);
>>> - if (tdep->has_sve ())
>>> - trad_frame_set_reg_addr (this_cache,
>>> - num_regs + AARCH64_SVE_V0_REGNUM + i,
>>> - offset);
>>> - }
>>> + aarch64_linux_restore_vreg (this_cache, num_regs, i, offset,
>>> + byte_order, tdep->has_sve ());
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> }
>>>
>>> trad_frame_set_id (this_cache, frame_id_build (sp, func));
>>> diff --git a/gdb/nat/aarch64-sve-linux-ptrace.c b/gdb/nat/aarch64-sve-linux-ptrace.c
>>> index 2ce90ccfd7..9ef5e91801 100644
>>> --- a/gdb/nat/aarch64-sve-linux-ptrace.c
>>> +++ b/gdb/nat/aarch64-sve-linux-ptrace.c
>>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>>> #include "arch/aarch64.h"
>>> #include "gdbsupport/common-regcache.h"
>>> #include "gdbsupport/byte-vector.h"
>>> +#include <endian.h>
>>>
>>> /* See nat/aarch64-sve-linux-ptrace.h. */
>>>
>>> @@ -142,6 +143,27 @@ aarch64_sve_get_sveregs (int tid)
>>> return buf;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +/* If we are running in BE mode, convert the contents
>>> + of VALUE (a 16 byte buffer) to LE. */
>>> +
>>> +static void
>>> +aarch64_maybe_swab128 (gdb_byte *value)
>>> +{
>>> + gdb_assert (value != nullptr);
>>> +
>>> +#if (__BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN)
>>> + gdb_byte copy[16];
>>> +
>>> + /* Save the original value. */
>>> + memcpy (copy, value, 16);
>>> +
>>> + for (int i = 0; i < 15; i++)
>>> + value[i] = copy[15 - i];
>>> +#else
>>> + /* Nothing to be done. */
>>> +#endif
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> /* See nat/aarch64-sve-linux-ptrace.h. */
>>>
>>> void
>>> @@ -184,11 +206,22 @@ aarch64_sve_regs_copy_to_reg_buf (struct reg_buffer_common *reg_buf,
>>> }
>>> else
>>> {
>>> + /* WARNING: SIMD state is laid out in memory in target-endian format,
>>> + while SVE state is laid out in an endianness-independent format (LE).
>>> +
>>> + So we have a couple cases to consider:
>>> +
>>> + 1 - If the target is big endian, then SIMD state is big endian,
>>> + requiring a byteswap.
>>> +
>>> + 2 - If the target is little endian, then SIMD state is little endian,
>>> + which matches the SVE format, so no byteswap is needed. */
>>> +
>>> /* There is no SVE state yet - the register dump contains a fpsimd
>>> structure instead. These registers still exist in the hardware, but
>>> the kernel has not yet initialised them, and so they will be null. */
>>>
>>> - char *zero_reg = (char *) alloca (SVE_PT_SVE_ZREG_SIZE (vq));
>>> + gdb_byte *zero_reg = (gdb_byte *) alloca (SVE_PT_SVE_ZREG_SIZE (vq));
>>> struct user_fpsimd_state *fpsimd
>>> = (struct user_fpsimd_state *)(base + SVE_PT_FPSIMD_OFFSET);
>>>
>>> @@ -199,7 +232,9 @@ aarch64_sve_regs_copy_to_reg_buf (struct reg_buffer_common *reg_buf,
>>>
>>> for (int i = 0; i < AARCH64_SVE_Z_REGS_NUM; i++)
>>> {
>>> - memcpy (zero_reg, &fpsimd->vregs[i], sizeof (__int128_t));
>>> + memcpy (zero_reg, &fpsimd->vregs[i], 16);
>>> + /* Handle big endian/little endian SIMD/SVE conversion. */
>>> + aarch64_maybe_swab128 (zero_reg);
>> I think we have a long standing bug here. zero_reg was meant to stay as the value 0. But then
>> it got reused as a general temp buffer.
>> It’s not shown in the diff, but we do:
>> * memset zero_reg to 0
>> * use zero_reg as a temp buffer for copying fpsimd values.
>> * use zero_reg as value 0 for fpsr and fpcr.
>> The memset needs moving after using it for fpsimd. (maybe also rename zero_reg to buf?)
>
> I'll address this.
>
>> Can we also reduce the number of memcpys - just byte swap vregs[i] directly into the zero_reg buffer?
>
> The byte swap function only swaps things for __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN, we would still need to memcpy the bytes to zero_reg. The number of memcpy's would be the same, no?
For LE, we want to copy into zero_reg to ensure it is zero padded after 128bits, then call raw_supply.
So that’s all fine.
For BE, we could just byteswap directly from fpsimd->vregs[i] into zero_reg (?) No need for any memcpys.
>
>>> reg_buf->raw_supply (AARCH64_SVE_Z0_REGNUM + i, zero_reg);
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -240,7 +275,7 @@ aarch64_sve_regs_copy_from_reg_buf (const struct reg_buffer_common *reg_buf,
>>> kernel, which is why we try to avoid it. */
>>>
>>> bool has_sve_state = false;
>>> - char *zero_reg = (char *) alloca (SVE_PT_SVE_ZREG_SIZE (vq));
>>> + gdb_byte *zero_reg = (gdb_byte *) alloca (SVE_PT_SVE_ZREG_SIZE (vq));
>>> struct user_fpsimd_state *fpsimd
>>> = (struct user_fpsimd_state *)(base + SVE_PT_FPSIMD_OFFSET);
>>>
>>> @@ -274,6 +309,18 @@ aarch64_sve_regs_copy_from_reg_buf (const struct reg_buffer_common *reg_buf,
>>> write out state and return. */
>>> if (!has_sve_state)
>>> {
>>> + /* WARNING: SIMD state is laid out in memory in target-endian format,
>>> + while SVE state is laid out in an endianness-independent format
>>> + (LE).
>>> +
>>> + So we have a couple cases to consider:
>>> +
>>> + 1 - If the target is big endian, then SIMD state is big endian,
>>> + requiring a byteswap.
>>> +
>>> + 2 - If the target is little endian, then SIMD state is little
>>> + endian, which matches the SVE format, so no byteswap is needed. */
>>> +
>>> /* The collects of the Z registers will overflow the size of a vreg.
>>> There is enough space in the structure to allow for this, but we
>>> cannot overflow into the next register as we might not be
>>> @@ -285,7 +332,9 @@ aarch64_sve_regs_copy_from_reg_buf (const struct reg_buffer_common *reg_buf,
>>> == reg_buf->get_register_status (AARCH64_SVE_Z0_REGNUM + i))
>>> {
>>> reg_buf->raw_collect (AARCH64_SVE_Z0_REGNUM + i, zero_reg);
>>> - memcpy (&fpsimd->vregs[i], zero_reg, sizeof (__int128_t));
>>> + /* Handle big endian/little endian SIMD/SVE conversion. */
>>> + aarch64_maybe_swab128 (zero_reg);
>>> + memcpy (&fpsimd->vregs[i], zero_reg, 16);
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> diff --git a/gdb/trad-frame.c b/gdb/trad-frame.c
>>> index a6a84790a9..8a1aa818ad 100644
>>> --- a/gdb/trad-frame.c
>>> +++ b/gdb/trad-frame.c
>>> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ trad_frame_reset_saved_regs (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
>>> {
>>> regs[regnum].realreg = regnum;
>>> regs[regnum].addr = -1;
>>> + regs[regnum].data = nullptr;
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -83,7 +84,7 @@ trad_frame_alloc_saved_regs (struct frame_info *this_frame)
>>> return trad_frame_alloc_saved_regs (gdbarch);
>>> }
>>>
>>> -enum { TF_REG_VALUE = -1, TF_REG_UNKNOWN = -2 };
>>> +enum { TF_REG_VALUE = -1, TF_REG_UNKNOWN = -2, TF_REG_VALUE_BYTES = -3 };
>>>
>>> int
>>> trad_frame_value_p (struct trad_frame_saved_reg this_saved_regs[], int regnum)
>>> @@ -106,6 +107,16 @@ trad_frame_realreg_p (struct trad_frame_saved_reg this_saved_regs[],
>>> && this_saved_regs[regnum].addr == -1);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +/* See trad-frame.h. */
>>> +
>>> +bool
>>> +trad_frame_value_bytes_p (struct trad_frame_saved_reg this_saved_regs[],
>>> + int regnum)
>>> +{
>>> + return (this_saved_regs[regnum].realreg == TF_REG_VALUE_BYTES
>>> + && this_saved_regs[regnum].data != nullptr);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> void
>>> trad_frame_set_value (struct trad_frame_saved_reg this_saved_regs[],
>>> int regnum, LONGEST val)
>>> @@ -224,6 +235,35 @@ trad_frame_set_unknown (struct trad_frame_saved_reg this_saved_regs[],
>>> this_saved_regs[regnum].addr = -1;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +/* See trad-frame.h. */
>>> +
>>> +void
>>> +trad_frame_set_value_bytes (struct trad_frame_saved_reg this_saved_regs[],
>>> + int regnum, const gdb_byte *bytes,
>>> + size_t size)
>>> +{
>>> + this_saved_regs[regnum].realreg = TF_REG_VALUE_BYTES;
>>> +
>>> + /* Allocate the space and copy the data bytes. */
>>> + this_saved_regs[regnum].data = FRAME_OBSTACK_CALLOC (size, gdb_byte);
>> Am I right to assume this means data will be automatically unallocated when
>> the trad_frame_saved_reg goes out of scope?
>
> Not when it goes out of scope, but when all the frame-related data is freed by GDB just before restarting inferior movement.
Ok.
>
>>> + memcpy (this_saved_regs[regnum].data, bytes, size);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/* See trad-frame.h. */
>>> +
>>> +void
>>> +trad_frame_set_reg_value_bytes (struct trad_frame_cache *this_trad_cache,
>>> + int regnum, const gdb_byte *bytes,
>>> + size_t size)
>>> +{
>>> + /* External interface for users of trad_frame_cache
>>> + (who cannot access the prev_regs object directly). */
>>> + trad_frame_set_value_bytes (this_trad_cache->prev_regs, regnum, bytes,
>>> + size);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +
>>> +
>>> struct value *
>>> trad_frame_get_prev_register (struct frame_info *this_frame,
>>> struct trad_frame_saved_reg this_saved_regs[],
>>> @@ -240,6 +280,10 @@ trad_frame_get_prev_register (struct frame_info *this_frame,
>>> /* The register's value is available. */
>>> return frame_unwind_got_constant (this_frame, regnum,
>>> this_saved_regs[regnum].addr);
>>> + else if (trad_frame_value_bytes_p (this_saved_regs, regnum))
>>> + /* The register's value is available as a sequence of bytes. */
>>> + return frame_unwind_got_bytes (this_frame, regnum,
>>> + this_saved_regs[regnum].data);
>>> else
>>> return frame_unwind_got_optimized (this_frame, regnum);
>>> }
>>> diff --git a/gdb/trad-frame.h b/gdb/trad-frame.h
>>> index 7b5785616e..38db439579 100644
>>> --- a/gdb/trad-frame.h
>>> +++ b/gdb/trad-frame.h
>>> @@ -52,6 +52,12 @@ void trad_frame_set_reg_regmap (struct trad_frame_cache *this_trad_cache,
>>> void trad_frame_set_reg_value (struct trad_frame_cache *this_cache,
>>> int regnum, LONGEST val);
>>>
>>> +/* Given the cache in THIS_TRAD_CACHE, set the value of REGNUM to the bytes
>>> + contained in BYTES with size SIZE. */
>>> +void trad_frame_set_reg_value_bytes (struct trad_frame_cache *this_trad_cache,
>>> + int regnum, const gdb_byte *bytes,
>>> + size_t size);
>>> +
>>> struct value *trad_frame_get_register (struct trad_frame_cache *this_trad_cache,
>>> struct frame_info *this_frame,
>>> int regnum);
>>> @@ -86,6 +92,8 @@ struct trad_frame_saved_reg
>>> {
>>> LONGEST addr; /* A CORE_ADDR fits in a longest. */
>>> int realreg;
>>> + /* Register data (for values that don't fit in ADDR). */
>>> + gdb_byte *data;
>>> };
>>>
>>> /* Encode REGNUM value in the trad-frame. */
>>> @@ -104,6 +112,12 @@ void trad_frame_set_addr (struct trad_frame_saved_reg this_trad_cache[],
>>> void trad_frame_set_unknown (struct trad_frame_saved_reg this_saved_regs[],
>>> int regnum);
>>>
>>> +/* Encode REGNUM value in the trad-frame as a sequence of bytes. This is
>>> + useful when the value is larger than what primitive types can hold. */
>>> +void trad_frame_set_value_bytes (struct trad_frame_saved_reg this_saved_regs[],
>>> + int regnum, const gdb_byte *bytes,
>>> + size_t size);
>>> +
>>> /* Convenience functions, return non-zero if the register has been
>>> encoded as specified. */
>>> int trad_frame_value_p (struct trad_frame_saved_reg this_saved_regs[],
>>> @@ -113,6 +127,11 @@ int trad_frame_addr_p (struct trad_frame_saved_reg this_saved_regs[],
>>> int trad_frame_realreg_p (struct trad_frame_saved_reg this_saved_regs[],
>>> int regnum);
>>>
>>> +/* Return TRUE if REGNUM is stored as a sequence of bytes, and FALSE
>>> + otherwise. */
>>> +bool trad_frame_value_bytes_p (struct trad_frame_saved_reg this_saved_regs[],
>>> + int regnum);
>>> +
>>> /* Reset the save regs cache, setting register values to -1. */
>>> void trad_frame_reset_saved_regs (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
>>> struct trad_frame_saved_reg *regs);
>>> --
>>> 2.25.1
>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-01 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-30 18:55 Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-01 11:28 ` Alan Hayward via Gdb-patches
2020-12-01 12:19 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-01 17:38 ` Alan Hayward via Gdb-patches [this message]
2020-12-01 18:40 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-02 9:07 ` Alan Hayward via Gdb-patches
2020-12-02 17:57 ` [PATCH,v2] " Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-03 17:35 ` Alan Hayward via Gdb-patches
2020-12-03 17:37 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-04 14:22 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-08 13:39 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2020-12-08 16:10 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-12-08 19:22 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C44EA479-F3B1-4D1F-B2D4-A91E8349080E@arm.com \
--to=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=Alan.Hayward@arm.com \
--cc=luis.machado@linaro.org \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox