Re: [RFA]: dwarf2expr.[ch]

[Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>]

On Monday, July 8, 2002, at 11:15  PM, Andrew Cagney wrote:

> Daniel,
>
> Just a reminder.  As a GNU developer, you're expected to submit 
> patches that meet the GNU coding standard.  This is important as it 
> saves on significiant run-around time spent by both yourself and the 
> reviewer.
>
I'll just ignore this sentence, rather than point out just how absurd 
this statement is when it comes to GDB development.
If you feel the need to remind me, I'm pretty sure you don't need to 
copy gdb-patches and Jim. Especially since this seems to be a personal 
message addressed to me.
Not that I mind, but i'm pretty sure Jim doesn't care, and it's 
debatable whether anyone else does.

> I guess you ment, work-in-progress.
>
No, I diffed the wrong version.
It's a moot issue anyway, as I said, since it's just two new files that 
are really part of another patch I need to resubmit with revisions 
anyway.
the RFA was added by my mailer as the default subject prefix for new 
messages gdb-patches and i didn't notice.

> enjoy,
> Andrew
>
>