From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12188 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2004 23:08:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12179 invoked from network); 20 Nov 2004 23:08:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rwcrmhc11.comcast.net) (204.127.198.35) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 20 Nov 2004 23:08:05 -0000 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (h000393256f12.ne.client2.attbi.com[24.61.199.96]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with SMTP id <20041120230804013005qtvue>; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 23:08:04 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.1.0.040913 Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 23:08:00 -0000 Subject: Re: Can we have the intl directory back? From: Paul Schlie To: Message-ID: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00414.txt.bz2 I have to confess being thoroughly confused about what is meant by: GNU vs. NON-GNU systems; and in what way it's relevant? As if the term "GNU system" is being used as a euphemism for Linux, implying that decisions may become increasing biased toward Linux, it would be most unfortunate; as regardless of one's philosophical views, uniform support of GNU tools for all reasonably significant POSIX based platforms and supported targets likely remain fundamentally significant to the GNU project's continued long term success, and should not become confused by any potential desire affect Linux's longer term success at the expense of others (which I trust isn't the intent or case).