From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15316 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2009 08:49:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 15308 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Feb 2009 08:49:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (212.99.106.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 08:48:58 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA55729000D; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:48:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id owcsLp7eNxI9; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:48:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from ulanbator.act-europe.fr (ulanbator.act-europe.fr [10.10.1.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C4F290003; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:48:52 +0100 (CET) Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Message-Id: From: Tristan Gingold To: Mark Kettenis In-Reply-To: <200902051731.n15HVpE0024214@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix i386-sse.exp regression on Darwin Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 08:49:00 -0000 References: <200902051731.n15HVpE0024214@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-02/txt/msg00152.txt.bz2 On Feb 5, 2009, at 6:31 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote: >> From: Tristan Gingold >> Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:02:49 +0100 >> >> Hi, >> >> xmm0 is a scratch register for the Darwin/i386 ABI and therefore may >> be destroyed by calling a function. >> This patch fix a regression on Darwin by replacing a function call by >> a asm nop. The only purpose of the >> function call was to be able to put a breakpoint. > > ok with me Thanks, committed. Tristan.