Re: [RFA] Darwin/x86 port (v4 - part 0/4)

Pedro Alves
2008-11-14T18:14:48Z

On Friday 14 November 2008 17:47:03, Stan Shebs wrote:
> Tristan Gingold wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 14, 2008, at 5:41 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> >
> >> On Friday 14 November 2008 16:26:23, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> >>> + @table @code
> >>> + @item set debug inferior @var{num}
> >>> + @kindex set debug inferior
> >>> + When set to a non zero value, enables debugging messages specific to
> >>> + the Darwin support. The bigger the value is the more verbose the
> >>> output is.
> >>
> >> Please don't use "inferior" for darwin specific things. It is a very
> >> general term, and collides with what we may want to do with the
> >> common gdb/inferior.c module.
> >
> > Ok, will change to "maint darwin-debug"
> >
> We have "set debug" that is generally available; some of the options are
> clearly maintenance-only, such as "set debug infrun", so that seems a
> convenient place for a Darwin-specific flag. (We could add "maint set
> debug", but that seems a little too pedantic :-) .)

I'm OK with "set debug", just not "set debug inferior".

"set debug darwin" would also be fine with me.

--
Pedro Alves