From: Matt Rice <ratmice@gmail.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>,
Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] Introduce `pre_expanded sals'
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 22:22:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTinAdSTDymg1ykRnGrHm=oeONM9HUQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201104121430.24596.pedro@codesourcery.com>
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> Another argument,
> is that frontends and users using them aren't expecting that a single
> breakpoint is represented by more than one visual "point", circle next to
> the sources, or something like that. Hitting F8 to toggle a breakpoint's
> enablement changing some other location source "point" enablement
> in the sources not currently visible seems to break some abstration
> to me. I think such design change needs to consider all these
> issues (and be experimented with some frontend).
I think this "visual point" metaphor to some extent is already broken,
I more often than one might expect end up setting multiple breakpoints
on the same function
with different conditions and or commands.
could be as simple as a number inside the "visual point", and adding a
right-click 'breakpoint editor', thing to bring up another window.
to me, this seems like something which should be allowed, but not
something to surprise a user with.
thus, this leads me to ask, does this happen because it is the users
intent, or something else.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-12 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-04 3:08 Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-04-06 20:13 ` Tom Tromey
2011-04-12 11:18 ` Pedro Alves
2011-04-12 11:53 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-04-12 13:30 ` Pedro Alves
2011-04-12 20:34 ` Tom Tromey
2011-04-12 22:22 ` Matt Rice [this message]
2011-04-13 9:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-07-27 17:08 ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-29 20:36 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-08-04 20:41 ` Tom Tromey
2011-08-05 3:41 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-08-05 14:40 ` Tom Tromey
2011-08-05 18:06 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2011-08-10 14:24 ` Tom Tromey
2011-05-03 16:09 ` Jerome Guitton
2011-05-03 18:17 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-04-12 20:26 ` Tom Tromey
2011-04-13 9:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-13 19:20 ` Tom Tromey
2011-04-15 10:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-18 18:37 ` Pedro Alves
2011-04-27 18:02 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-04-29 20:42 ` Tom Tromey
2011-04-11 21:08 ` Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='BANLkTinAdSTDymg1ykRnGrHm=oeONM9HUQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ratmice@gmail.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=sergiodj@redhat.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox