From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31804 invoked by alias); 11 May 2011 15:50:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 31784 invoked by uid 22791); 11 May 2011 15:50:10 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (74.125.121.67) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:49:55 +0000 Received: from hpaq1.eem.corp.google.com (hpaq1.eem.corp.google.com [172.25.149.1]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id p4BFnsok031339 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 08:49:54 -0700 Received: from gxk7 (gxk7.prod.google.com [10.202.11.7]) by hpaq1.eem.corp.google.com with ESMTP id p4BFnoC3028718 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 08:49:52 -0700 Received: by gxk7 with SMTP id 7so287007gxk.21 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 08:49:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.91.33.1 with SMTP id l1mr8207734agj.207.1305128992225; Wed, 11 May 2011 08:49:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.72.6 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 08:49:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110511073900.GA1776@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <20110510204641.A4C73246199@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> <201105102230.29758.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20110511073900.GA1776@host1.jankratochvil.net> Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 15:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFA] Remove set debug lin-lwp-async, new ui_file.to_write_async_safe From: Doug Evans To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00288.txt.bz2 On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Wed, 11 May 2011 00:19:36 +0200, Doug Evans wrote: >> If it became an issue, one could record fileno ahead of time. > > Isn't it simple enough in stdio_file_new? Sounds like what I would do. >> For gettext(), I'd be happy with just removing it for this particular ca= se. > > One can call it from _initialize_ui_file. =A0There are no catalogues now = but > they should be. If it's important enough, sure.