From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-81850-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 12794 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2011 14:51:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 12786 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jun 2011 14:51:45 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-qw0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-qw0-f41.google.com) (209.85.216.41)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:51:30 +0000
Received: by qwa26 with SMTP id 26so889951qwa.0        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 07:51:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.79.196 with SMTP id q4mr648566qck.132.1309359089961; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 07:51:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.214.83 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 07:51:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m3liwk3dg9.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
References: <20100920135856.GA27953@intel.com>	<m3hb797nqu.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<BANLkTik+R_PTz_w7j8mAKmWqnz-gmprOWQ@mail.gmail.com>	<m3liwk3dg9.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:51:00 -0000
Message-ID: <BANLkTim3i2U37bBUuFryQ9g1O8QpKNNmXw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: PR testsuite/12040: GDB Fortran tests use g77 instead of gfortran
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: GDB <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00448.txt.bz2

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
> Tom> I sent a patch to dejagnu to allow f90 today; so perhaps the result
> Tom> could be based on that. =A0I can do the work if you like, just let me
> Tom> know.
>
> H.J.> Please do.
>
> Here is what I am checking in.
>
> This moves the copied code to a new file, future.exp, and arranges to
> always load it. =A0I refreshed one copied proc from dejagnu, with my
> gfortran patch included. =A0I also changed how the overrides are
> installed.
>
> Tom
>
> 2011-06-29 =A0Tom Tromey =A0<tromey@redhat.com>
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0PR testsuite/12040:
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* lib/future.exp: New file, mostly extracted from ada.exp.
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Rewrote compatibility code to use rename.
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(gdb_find_gfortran): New proc.
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(gdb_default_target_compile): Refresh from dejagnu; plus a=
 pending
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0gfortran patch.
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* lib/ada.exp (gdb_find_gnatmake, gdb_default_target_compi=
le):
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Move to future.exp.
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* lib/gdb.exp: Always load future.exp.
>

Did we get gfortran when searching for F77/f77 compiler?

--=20
H.J.