From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-81866-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 16935 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2011 17:52:33 -0000
Received: (qmail 16923 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jun 2011 17:52:31 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-qw0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-qw0-f41.google.com) (209.85.216.41)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:52:16 +0000
Received: by qwa26 with SMTP id 26so1008771qwa.0        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:52:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.79.196 with SMTP id q4mr828423qck.132.1309369935818; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.214.83 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m3ei2czfw0.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
References: <20100920135856.GA27953@intel.com>	<m3hb797nqu.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<BANLkTik+R_PTz_w7j8mAKmWqnz-gmprOWQ@mail.gmail.com>	<m3liwk3dg9.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<BANLkTim3i2U37bBUuFryQ9g1O8QpKNNmXw@mail.gmail.com>	<m3fwms3csh.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<m3ei2czfw0.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:52:00 -0000
Message-ID: <BANLkTik5kVZOQ0hudSC--+Sv2B7jXD=SWA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: PR testsuite/12040: GDB Fortran tests use g77 instead of gfortran
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: GDB <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00464.txt.bz2

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
> H.J.> Did we get gfortran when searching for F77/f77 compiler?
>
> Tom> No, I forgot the most crucial bit :)
> Tom> I will write a follow-up patch to make our tests use gfortran.
> Tom> I don't think supporting g77 is all that worthwhile any more.
>
> Here is the follow-up. =A0I am checking it in.
>
> This patch switches all the gdb.fortran tests to use the new gfortran
> support.
>
> Built and regested both locally and by the buildbot.
>
> Note that this introduces new FAILs:
>
> FAIL: gdb.fortran/array-element.exp: continue to breakpoint once again (t=
he program exited)
> FAIL: gdb.fortran/array-element.exp: print the second element of array a
>
>
> These tests were previously not run, at least not on the machines I use.
> This is really just a single failure; I looked at it briefly and it is
> either a gfortran bug, or a bad assumption on the part of the testcase
> writer. =A0I don't actually know Fortran so it is hard to say.
>
> Tom
>
> 2011-06-29 =A0Tom Tromey =A0<tromey@redhat.com>
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0PR testsuite/12040:
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* gdb.fortran/array-element.exp: Use f90, not f77.
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* gdb.fortran/complex.exp: Use f90, not f77.
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* gdb.fortran/derived-type.exp: Use f90, not f77.
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* gdb.fortran/library-module.exp: Use f90, not f77.
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* gdb.fortran/logical.exp: Use f90, not f77.
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* gdb.fortran/module.exp: Use f90, not f77.
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* gdb.fortran/multi-dim.exp: Use f90, not f77.
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* gdb.fortran/subarray.exp: Use f90, not f77.
>

gfortran can be used as F77 compiler.  Why not just return gfortran
for f77?


--=20
H.J.