Re: [PATCH v2] tracepoint: add new trace command "printf" and agent expression "printf" [3] doc

[Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 01:24, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:26:47 +0800
>> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, brobecker@adacore.com, dje@google.com,
>>       stan@codesourcery.com, tromey@redhat.com
>>
>> [1:text/plain Hide]
>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 15:09, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> >> From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
>> >> Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 14:32:55 +0800
>> >> Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, Doug Evans <dje@google.com>,
>> >>       Stan Shebs <stan@codesourcery.com>, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
>> >>
>> >> +@item @code{printf} (0x31) @var{n} @var{template}: @result{}
>> >> +Print the values in the stack under the control of the string template.
>> >> +The end of @var{template} is 0x00.
>> >
>> > I don't understand the last sentence.  Do you mean to say that the
>> > template is a null-terminated string?
>> >
>> >> +If @var{n} is 0, just output the string template.
>> >> +If @var{n} is 1, pop a value from the stack and print it under the control
>> >> +of the string template.
>> >
>> > Does this support only a single value?  That's not what one would
>> > normally expect from something called "printf".  If it can pop more
>> > than one value, that should be documented.
>> >
>> >> +@kindex printf
>> >> +@item printf @var{template}, @var{expressions}@dots{}
>> >> +Print the values of one or more @var{expressions} under the control of
>> >> +the string @var{template} in @code{gdbserver} part.
>> >
>> > What do you mean by "in @code{gdbserver} part"?
>> >
>> >> +The command format is with simple @code{printf} (@pxref{Output, printf}).
>> >
>> > This sentence's intent is not clear to me.  Can you explain what were
>> > you trying to say?
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>>
>> Faint, I send an old patch.  So sorry about that.
>>
>> That attchment is the right patch.
>
> Thanks, this version is much better.  But this question is still
> unanswered:
>
>> >> +If @var{n} is 0, just output the string template.
>> >> +If @var{n} is 1, pop a value from the stack and print it under the control
>> >> +of the string template.
>> >
>> > Does this support only a single value?  That's not what one would
>> > normally expect from something called "printf".  If it can pop more
>> > than one value, that should be documented.
>

Hi Eli,

Sorry for late.

This is not the introduce of tracepoint printf.  The tracepoint printf
will work like a simple printf.
It will divide a printf string into a lot of GDB agent code.  So each
GDB agent code just support one argument.

I make each gdb agent code printf support one argument because I found
that multi-argument is hard to support.

Thanks,
Hui