Re: Status of the AArch* builders

Alan Hayward
2018-10-11T09:23:51Z

> On 24 Sep 2018, at 15:39, Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Monday, September 24 2018, Alan Hayward wrote:
>
>>> On 20 Sep 2018, at 22:15, Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> Just a ping to see if you have progressed on this. I've left the AArch*
>>> builders there, and now they're *really* behind (more than 1000 builds
>>> in the queue), and at least one of the buildslaves is offline.
>>>
>>> I will temporarily remove the builders now, but it would be really nice
>>> to keep having AArch* builders in our BuildBot.
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot,
>>
>>
>> Ramana has got some aarch64 machines up on packet.net for use in buildbot instead
>> of the existing machines. I think a few things just need finalising before they can
>> be handed over.
>
> That's great news. Thanks for doing that.
>
>> Once that’s done I can get buildbot set up on them. Are there some simple instructions
>> for getting this going?
>
> There are instructions on our wiki:
>
> https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/BuildBot#How_to_add_your_buildslave
>
> But please do let me know if you need any help. I can take care of the
> configuration on my side, so you don't have to submit a patch for the
> master.cfg file (although you can if you want).
>

The machine is now ready for buildbot!

Aarch64, Ubuntu 16.04.5 LTS, 96 cores

I’ve setup buildbot-slave-0.8.14 in a virtualenv/
(Oddly, I had to install twisted==16.4.1, as anything newer than that caused a hang).

I’ve manually checked you can build gdb and run the testsuite.

My recent experiments with the testsuite on Aarch64 show all the threaded tests
are quite racy on a fully loaded ubuntu, whereas on redhat/suse they are fairly
stable. I’m still looking into why this is. But, in the short-term maybe we should
restrict the number of jobs to 32 (or maybe even fewer?)

Sergio, could you please add the relevant server config.

Thanks,
Alan.