Re: [PATCHv5] Fix range end handling of inlined subroutines

Bernd Edlinger
2020-04-05T00:05:40Z

On 4/5/20 12:30 AM, Luis Machado wrote:
> On 4/4/20 7:27 PM, Luis Machado wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 4/4/20 4:50 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> this is an updated version of my patch that was originally only intended
>>> to fix the issues with inline functions in the same file.  That needed
>>> re-basing anyway, because of a merge conflict.
>>>
>>> I removed the code that does the special handling of end sequence
>>> markers in record_line now, since it seems to cause more problems than
>>> it solves.
>>>
>>> I believe it will fix the regression that Louis pointed out, and
>>> should fix the regression that Andrew wanted to fix with his
>>> patch:
>>
>> I gave this a try and the FAIL's are still there unfortunately.
>
> Actually, there are 6 more of them, with the patch. I'll read through the thread to understand what these changes are aiming to fix.
>
> I wouldn't be surprised if GDB is covering some known compiler debug info generation hiccup.

Thanks Luis,

even a FAIL allows me to learn out of it :)

Bernd.