Re: [PATCHv5] Fix range end handling of inlined subroutines

Bernd Edlinger
2020-04-04T23:38:06Z

On 4/5/20 12:27 AM, Luis Machado wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 4/4/20 4:50 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this is an updated version of my patch that was originally only intended
>> to fix the issues with inline functions in the same file.  That needed
>> re-basing anyway, because of a merge conflict.
>>
>> I removed the code that does the special handling of end sequence
>> markers in record_line now, since it seems to cause more problems than
>> it solves.
>>
>> I believe it will fix the regression that Louis pointed out, and
>> should fix the regression that Andrew wanted to fix with his
>> patch:
>
> I gave this a try and the FAIL's are still there unfortunately.

Yes, I already am aware, short after I wrote the mail,
I think I have now the right idea, I will probably post another
version of the patch....

For your test case we need to make sure that the line entries
at the end of a function are acutually deleted.
That is easy, writing the right thing in the comment will be
hard.

Bernd.