Re: [PATCHv5] Fix range end handling of inlined subroutines

Luis Machado
2020-04-04T22:31:03Z

On 4/4/20 7:27 PM, Luis Machado wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 4/4/20 4:50 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this is an updated version of my patch that was originally only intended
>> to fix the issues with inline functions in the same file.  That needed
>> re-basing anyway, because of a merge conflict.
>>
>> I removed the code that does the special handling of end sequence
>> markers in record_line now, since it seems to cause more problems than
>> it solves.
>>
>> I believe it will fix the regression that Louis pointed out, and
>> should fix the regression that Andrew wanted to fix with his
>> patch:
>
> I gave this a try and the FAIL's are still there unfortunately.

Actually, there are 6 more of them, with the patch. I'll read through
the thread to understand what these changes are aiming to fix.

I wouldn't be surprised if GDB is covering some known compiler debug
info generation hiccup.