From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from EUR01-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-db5eur01olkn0822.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe02::822]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9B20385DC00 for ; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 00:05:40 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org E9B20385DC00 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=hotmail.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=djgjf0CgrGqr2HeUvlvvxW2MGHdJlg79WOAodr8PVcsejOYRsFpROJ2dBtGVPP6emwjK2NmW//w4BXU+Z2C5Zosvo6XsrLvLTqubd1/KyYbzWUeewVnpmnRyswJowYRYTI8QXrSmGlnzA00SzW9ALliIKXgXJt83sj8xslu+FU9ovDDajsAPLf4BO4SXCpIU0i9vVLZsiRrLQPA5f7h+6QbF0x8csXEmKnmT/bMeg5rTg95+KXf4lo5f5P0nwTI6BfaBOKeZNJ+48qWRtPUy+07C5CGDN+uafoKHB7AsLTLzX6+ydadIM8nepGgG0ezanKlP/UmPP+ztGalYnwCQJw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=SzRplGp81ZytxeOSGvOV3cPtaCtbecymQgAQ5OrhFmM=; b=VdMmL+jVxu/pNE9w8tojvQRrIu4hRKAp/OeGJyETpCz1ivUdjQGxfFkq+fZJBayE2vQ3zkS4xPmsO7qvzrYYeU6OJts6zL2BtyjUPLlFzpsaZK68eX1B1jpZHzw0udY0HsiIUQYq9aghCn50t97bTSAdksPP4JkxXZf1r29BckTa0dQTdctEdxzVYxCmo39ETgutTOVuvaq8mMrb3pvJFHU2Vi1UeF4HxUczAZVLwIiIYT/TH63v/0guAu3/Hc+8aYGQ1BgWl45gaKcJWxv0Dfb7dm2kbYjmgBqDX+HLSZ5gYyODd2CuqULO9hgCntjHK6+S7urnuybW4JTZJQkMow== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=hotmail.de; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=hotmail.de; dkim=pass header.d=hotmail.de; arc=none Received: from DB5EUR01FT059.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e1a::4d) by DB5EUR01HT063.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e1a::474) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2878.15; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 00:05:39 +0000 Received: from AM6PR03MB5170.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e1a::44) by DB5EUR01FT059.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e1a::164) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2878.15 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 00:05:39 +0000 X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker: OriginalChecksum:C3F8839E8848E76362386300B601A98511AA610A376D17BA07702BEC01B300ED; UpperCasedChecksum:4476903DF862B5381AA934764861AC8BAB58B25AC1B9ACF2A43057603FA531D6; SizeAsReceived:8193; Count:49 Received: from AM6PR03MB5170.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d57:5853:a396:969d]) by AM6PR03MB5170.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d57:5853:a396:969d%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2878.018; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 00:05:39 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCHv5] Fix range end handling of inlined subroutines To: Luis Machado , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , Andrew Burgess , Tom Tromey References: <32bbd32e-7868-d102-1a72-42efafad5aef@linaro.org> From: Bernd Edlinger Message-ID: Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2020 02:05:38 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 In-Reply-To: <32bbd32e-7868-d102-1a72-42efafad5aef@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ClientProxiedBy: AM0PR01CA0044.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10a6:208:e6::21) To AM6PR03MB5170.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:ca::23) X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <271943b8-42a5-a916-5a0b-0c9f97fa94e9@hotmail.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from [192.168.1.101] (92.77.140.102) by AM0PR01CA0044.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10a6:208:e6::21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2878.15 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 00:05:38 +0000 X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <271943b8-42a5-a916-5a0b-0c9f97fa94e9@hotmail.de> X-TMN: [Pm5Mmu4A5hDfMlDASRoR5duM2ahe589j] X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-IncomingHeaderCount: 49 X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 98e6eb6d-b7ad-4b00-e4a7-08d7d8f512e3 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: DB5EUR01HT063: X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: j6LuUp6FmwVZRT6vk1uix1XiRBbEN6CJqcOFh8SpJQNBv9p9RMLNnBPMGHyyVHO5PkzLcxNiclKMT+YN17htFn8kGXW9y8BKVKGX/723nza3rUSQ5vMakh/ZfzHSO2xYy+bhkn1DuPYarS18j32bdrXy7j1bLAFH1CWjVDCnIeP2N9478thQJbEE7AirRPKU X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:0; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:AM6PR03MB5170.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:; DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: ZPZFKEamUhU5D7EImsDKQlUWo3YKXHEEOcghEeWhnqInu+egndzhg8kS7bPUxVzAAHRpRBd8I78Lff47j6HBKIvCwHfMIlEMSnUbzIAjaF8NEvCvDGCCMjJXljjScHPLqrKt5BaeCEfOMsfmJbqmMA== X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 98e6eb6d-b7ad-4b00-e4a7-08d7d8f512e3 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Apr 2020 00:05:39.5024 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB5EUR01HT063 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2020 00:05:42 -0000 On 4/5/20 12:30 AM, Luis Machado wrote: > On 4/4/20 7:27 PM, Luis Machado wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 4/4/20 4:50 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> this is an updated version of my patch that was originally only intended >>> to fix the issues with inline functions in the same file.  That needed >>> re-basing anyway, because of a merge conflict. >>> >>> I removed the code that does the special handling of end sequence >>> markers in record_line now, since it seems to cause more problems than >>> it solves. >>> >>> I believe it will fix the regression that Louis pointed out, and >>> should fix the regression that Andrew wanted to fix with his >>> patch: >> >> I gave this a try and the FAIL's are still there unfortunately. > > Actually, there are 6 more of them, with the patch. I'll read through the thread to understand what these changes are aiming to fix. > > I wouldn't be surprised if GDB is covering some known compiler debug info generation hiccup. Thanks Luis, even a FAIL allows me to learn out of it :) Bernd.