From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id Vi7xM1kL+1+mdAAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 09:12:41 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id C589E1EE85; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 09:12:41 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA, FREEMAIL_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (unknown [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EFEE1E940 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 09:12:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 883A23858038; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 14:12:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from EUR03-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092072074.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.72.74]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D467B3858038 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 14:12:37 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org D467B3858038 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=hotmail.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Wtr3UARkjkNIAGzgBj+s+7GknHEN5HvTh6LA4VUFgrkdH9tcIyeMN6jcLD64GVynG/q1fEMLIKFlNAtmffVc1PFexV+zFjY/qoiK0R7v9ii7UQa1TtopuEUc3b4dqKliHvIEQBa27kQeqxkTGDjgIT2ef1UgXbD/2rkvCJAbFGpUA0PzFJFsae138iyqFzribUWKEC0+mD2c5cRZ7C64C4+f974R/Q7PAgsjvA/u4SuzEOg5UXlLt0utH7TBvyKhtgt7GUqbPklnlunUhE0hqDTnUA4LmQWnnvs2QmxybS60xLcNFyV5zkhBTeUBZ3rT/bUcB90MtK3O725+wWVNnQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=x9I4saMvzkzfaXZS328ovb76nMqe5Gb3L77wudemku0=; b=EhDq9TPa993lVNtSqHDNium+XlqbokBoFXOobr9b0Cg0d4Q3gk3f0vrS5PshOLjAOQkDZTnlmlbaem8LEyGIcfFqFojR2KLaQ89eLtLzlTCO+PdiDJ+eBv9wdUzFziInqrXfONJoCeYPpdpwiDWM1v1Vqneo6j24mDkcXKFHRezU2S1nO+VuDVsKgXKMzG+3G62I5+IV2ru627a/HK7yhtV5kpLs5ipUP4jbc+lJhFkFkz18T1bDUv/44xgAuB9uagVRqHymy6oCgSz1WMVQpgIZ3cuoXfKwtOv3cz5zMO79xOQsfadPFtuobyJ7rlMAqvJ53N45FW/piliBq7V8Vg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none Received: from AM5EUR03FT063.eop-EUR03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e08::45) by AM5EUR03HT175.eop-EUR03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e08::487) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3742.6; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 14:12:36 +0000 Received: from AM0PR0602MB3410.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e08::48) by AM5EUR03FT063.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e08::226) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3742.6 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 14:12:36 +0000 X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker: OriginalChecksum:ED516F3B4DB99E7EEFC70EDA53DC77B64B0FECBDAA274FEE5C4DBC9116F325D6; UpperCasedChecksum:7321D7CA867D9FDFBD36697E91D892622078CB22537273E46677F852A9A1975D; SizeAsReceived:8977; Count:48 Received: from AM0PR0602MB3410.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::60c8:86c2:bdaa:f0d2]) by AM0PR0602MB3410.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::60c8:86c2:bdaa:f0d2%3]) with mapi id 15.20.3742.012; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 14:12:35 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Enable GDB build with in-tree GMP and MPFR To: Simon Marchi , Joel Brobecker References: <71f5437f-c4f5-b58d-06f7-67a4d0b31007@simark.ca> <214e9564-5dfd-65a2-c2d8-6e8398ebc913@simark.ca> <87o8iw9ilx.fsf@tromey.com> <20201215023315.GK3461@adacore.com> <4ea7575a-b727-d9b7-e510-5c8b942f77f9@polymtl.ca> <20201216073333.GA934694@adacore.com> <89e6d36b-7a4b-4eed-69bd-fa82add4dab0@polymtl.ca> <1451a5d1-97e4-3c37-030f-f2808249b100@polymtl.ca> From: Bernd Edlinger Message-ID: Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 15:12:30 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 In-Reply-To: <1451a5d1-97e4-3c37-030f-f2808249b100@polymtl.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TMN: [c8ZM5FKneAbXoVxsodReLa5IlgGbFCZX] X-ClientProxiedBy: AM3PR07CA0106.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:207:7::16) To AM0PR0602MB3410.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:208:21::24) X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from [192.168.1.101] (88.68.3.2) by AM3PR07CA0106.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:207:7::16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3763.6 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 14:12:31 +0000 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-IncomingHeaderCount: 48 X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 12b030e6-6c1a-40e9-5ac1-08d8b571c7b6 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: AM5EUR03HT175: X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: R/ZUv4lpsc40X8BclCH4x2f+C23V7SQjHzezakC1TAVCyPguicc1jQWF40dSvisx1+cU1TdauH5PZ8wkFYSyRY6diepSUpKPw73NT9QfOI5fhRW4kq6d1HlRBzjsXwv2m9tilyP30OUZbVv2OglwDA5lNkFn/3YZPuxG/VFi4wubq/g/oWh+eTi+lLoiYvG8bTpPp9gG+h84RUJRHJquX/KpVCwmktZNMkoMpZkgHGxQIrBcfW8dNUIJk3TFbqbR X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: EysM5/ZPuIRlDXx0DwD5rf9tw8H15gDvQJoat9QJUCSuzzkfc257uAZrEhZqjygtxCtRjR32NUo88Vpf7J0PIu8GKKWCwzJwqd98LColhs38KosaTlBNR+R4sVxVb30kiKlsKMdhGhhPM/qvvBppBQ== X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Jan 2021 14:12:35.8834 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 12b030e6-6c1a-40e9-5ac1-08d8b571c7b6 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: AM5EUR03FT063.eop-EUR03.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM5EUR03HT175 X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Pedro Alves , Tom Tromey , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 12/29/20 3:50 PM, Simon Marchi wrote: > On 2020-12-29 3:36 a.m., Bernd Edlinger wrote: >> Okay, I also like the second variant better. >> >> Can I assume that you agree to that variant? >> >> If yes, then I should send the patch regarding the >> toplevel configury change also to the binutils mailing list, >> right? > > I do prefer the second variant over the first one, because it's > simpler. > > But I prefer having none of them, and just having a built mpfr/gmp > be a prerequisite step to building GDB. > Hmm, I see, but it was argued previously on this list, that it is okay for GDB to have a mandatory dependency to GMP because GCC has the same dependency. However GCC offers exactly the same convenience as it allows GMP to be optionally built in-tree. Bernd.