From: Alan Hayward <Alan.Hayward@arm.com>
To: Matthew Malcomson <Matthew.Malcomson@arm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
Luis Machado <luis.machado@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] GDB: aarch64: Add ability to step over a BR/BLR instruction
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 16:13:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AF5A317E-E7F3-40AC-8186-F68ACC6C6D86@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM6PR08MB3157A6B1F059FC17E1C69E5DE07B0@AM6PR08MB3157.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
> On 20 Jul 2020, at 12:13, Matthew Malcomson <Matthew.Malcomson@arm.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> On 3 Jul 2020, at 16:36, Luis Machado <luis.machado@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 7/3/20 11:55 AM, Matthew Malcomson wrote:
>>>> Manually tested on AArch64 (it doesn't look like there are tests for
>>>> displaced stepping on the other instructions that are manually handled,
>>>> so I figured adding a testcase for BR and BLR would be out of place).
>>>
>>> Not out of place, but those just did not get added. A test that exercises displaced stepping over those two instructions would be a good addition. That or some unit testing code to make sure the function handled the instruction in the expected way.
>>
>> +1. Was going to write a very similar comment. A test for all the cases would be great.
>>
>
> I've added tests for the BR and BLR instructions rather than for all
> instructions due to time constraints ... I hope that's OK?
Sure, that’s fine.
>
>>>> ############### Attachment also inlined for ease of reply ###############
>>>> diff --git a/gdb/aarch64-tdep.c b/gdb/aarch64-tdep.c
>>>> index 5e7d0d0b8682af04ce4f01fd999d26c9eb459932..640a3e302f8e2b5fac3575e2f37212d40441d318 100644
>>>> --- a/gdb/aarch64-tdep.c
>>>> +++ b/gdb/aarch64-tdep.c
>>>> @@ -2974,15 +2974,22 @@ aarch64_displaced_step_others (const uint32_t insn,
>>>> struct aarch64_displaced_step_data *dsd
>>>> = (struct aarch64_displaced_step_data *) data;
>>>> - aarch64_emit_insn (dsd->insn_buf, insn);
>>>> - dsd->insn_count = 1;
>>>> -
>>>> - if ((insn & 0xfffffc1f) == 0xd65f0000)
>>
>> Maybe the 0xfffffc1f mask belongs in aarch64-insn.h
>>
>>>> + uint32_t masked_insn = (insn & 0xfffffc1f);
>
> Done.
>
>
>
>
> I'm not 100% confident on the approach of the testcase.
> I tried to make it robust and clear, but may have missed a better approach.
> (I used an assembly file to have easy control over the exact sequence of
> instructions, and I think this is the nicest approach even though there are
> only a few assembly files in the testsuite).
Your approach ensures that the functions have the correct instructions, so I
think that’s ok. Alternatively asm in a C file might have worked too.
Two minor, but important, nits to fix:
>
>
> ############### Attachment also inlined for ease of reply ###############
>
Missing 2x Changelogs.
>
> diff --git a/gdb/aarch64-tdep.c b/gdb/aarch64-tdep.c
> index 5e7d0d0b8682af04ce4f01fd999d26c9eb459932..d247108f53bf045a018b2bf85284088563868ae0 100644
> --- a/gdb/aarch64-tdep.c
> +++ b/gdb/aarch64-tdep.c
> @@ -2974,15 +2974,22 @@ aarch64_displaced_step_others (const uint32_t insn,
> struct aarch64_displaced_step_data *dsd
> = (struct aarch64_displaced_step_data *) data;
>
> - aarch64_emit_insn (dsd->insn_buf, insn);
> - dsd->insn_count = 1;
> -
> - if ((insn & 0xfffffc1f) == 0xd65f0000)
> + uint32_t masked_insn = (insn & CLEAR_Rn_MASK);
> + if (masked_insn == BLR)
> {
> - /* RET */
> - dsd->dsc->pc_adjust = 0;
> + /* Emit a BR to the same register and then update LR to the original
> + address (similar to aarch64_displaced_step_b). */
> + aarch64_emit_insn (dsd->insn_buf, insn & 0xffdfffff);
> + regcache_cooked_write_unsigned (dsd->regs, AARCH64_LR_REGNUM,
> + data->insn_addr + 4);
> }
> else
> + aarch64_emit_insn (dsd->insn_buf, insn);
> + dsd->insn_count = 1;
> +
> + if (masked_insn == RET || masked_insn == BR || masked_insn == BLR)
> + dsd->dsc->pc_adjust = 0;
> + else
> dsd->dsc->pc_adjust = 4;
> }
>
> diff --git a/gdb/arch/aarch64-insn.h b/gdb/arch/aarch64-insn.h
> index 6a63ce9c2005acd6fe018a12c640f1be01751d6b..f261363feefe4e93e155434ba6d3df8e4b994c9f 100644
> --- a/gdb/arch/aarch64-insn.h
> +++ b/gdb/arch/aarch64-insn.h
> @@ -40,7 +40,9 @@ enum aarch64_opcodes
> CBNZ = 0x21000000 | B,
> TBZ = 0x36000000 | B,
> TBNZ = 0x37000000 | B,
> + /* BR 1101 0110 0001 1111 0000 00rr rrr0 0000 */
> /* BLR 1101 0110 0011 1111 0000 00rr rrr0 0000 */
> + BR = 0xd61f0000,
> BLR = 0xd63f0000,
> /* RET 1101 0110 0101 1111 0000 00rr rrr0 0000 */
> RET = 0xd65f0000,
> @@ -107,6 +109,14 @@ enum aarch64_opcodes
> NOP = (0 << 5) | HINT,
> };
>
> +/* List of useful masks. */
> +enum aarch64_masks
> +{
> + /* Used for masking out an Rn argument from an opcode. */
> + CLEAR_Rn_MASK = 0xfffffc1f,
> +};
> +
> +
> /* Representation of a general purpose register of the form xN or wN.
>
> This type is used by emitting functions that take registers as operands. */
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/aarch64-disp-stepping.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/aarch64-disp-stepping.exp
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..54eae61358c084d9342318591b7dbc57aa265ee4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/aarch64-disp-stepping.exp
> @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
> +# Copyright 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> +#
> +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> +# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> +# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
> +# (at your option) any later version.
> +#
> +# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> +# GNU General Public License for more details.
> +#
> +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> +# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
> +#
> +# This file is part of the gdb testsuite.
> +
> +# Test displaced stepping over BR and BLR instructions.
> +
> +if {![is_aarch64_target]} {
> + verbose "Skipping ${gdb_test_file_name}."
> + return
> +}
> +
> +standard_testfile ".s"
> +if { [prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare" ${testfile} ${srcfile}] } {
> + return -1
> +}
> +
> +gdb_breakpoint "*blr_teststart"
> +gdb_breakpoint "*blr_testcheck"
> +gdb_breakpoint "*br_teststart"
> +gdb_breakpoint "*br_testcheck"
> +
> +
> +# Test for displaced stepping over the BLR instruction.
> +gdb_test "run" \
> + "Starting program.*Breakpoint $decimal.*" \
> + "Run until BLR test start"
> +
> +set expected_lr [get_hexadecimal_valueof "\$pc + 4" 0]
> +gdb_test "print/x \$x0" \
> + ".. = 0x0" \
> + "Ensure x0 is 0 before BLR test."
> +
> +gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "BLR test check"
> +
> +gdb_test "print/x \$lr == $expected_lr" \
> + ".. = 0x1" \
> + "Ensure LR is set to just after BLR."
> +gdb_test "print/x \$x0" \
> + ".. = 0x1" \
> + "Ensure x0 is 1 after BLR test."
> +
> +
> +# Test for displaced stepping over the BR instruction.
> +gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "BR test start"
> +
> +gdb_test "print/x \$x0" \
> + ".. = 0x0" \
> + "Ensure x0 is 0 before BR test."
> +gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "BR test check"
> +gdb_test "print/x \$x0" \
> + ".. = 0x1" \
> + "Ensure x0 is 1 after BR test."
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/aarch64-disp-stepping.s b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/aarch64-disp-stepping.s
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fb67333271e649388a613fb9558f39ff30297697
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/aarch64-disp-stepping.s
Missing copyright file header.
> @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
> +// Instructions not yet tested.
> +// - B
> +// - BL
> +// - B.COND
> +// - CBZ
> +// - CBNZ
> +// - TBZ
> +// - TBNZ
> +// - ADR
> +// - ADRP
> +// - LDR (literal)
> +// - RET
> +
> +// Function testing stepping over BLR instruction.
> + .text
> + .align 2
> + .global test_blr_stepping
> + .type test_blr_stepping, %function
> +test_blr_stepping:
> + .cfi_startproc
> + // x2 Stores the old LR.
> + mov x2,x30
> + // x0 is the indicator value to show whether the jump happened.
> + mov x0, #0
> + // Load the jump position into register x1
> + movz x1, :abs_g3:.LJUMPPOS
> + movk x1, :abs_g2_nc:.LJUMPPOS
> + movk x1, :abs_g1_nc:.LJUMPPOS
> + movk x1, :abs_g0_nc:.LJUMPPOS
> +blr_teststart:
> + blr x1
> + b blr_testcheck
> +.LJUMPPOS:
> + mov x0, #1
> +blr_testcheck:
> + // Put the old LR value back into the LR register.
> + // Do this for both successful jump and unsuccessful jump since the LR
> + // will have changed both times and we want the program to continue
> + // properly both times.
> + mov x30, x2
> + ret
> + .cfi_endproc
> + .size test_blr_stepping, .-test_blr_stepping
> +
> +
> +// Function testing stepping over BR instruction.
> + .text
> + .align 2
> + .global test_br_stepping
> + .type test_br_stepping, %function
> +test_br_stepping:
> + .cfi_startproc
> + // x0 is the indicator value to show whether the jump happened.
> + mov x0, #0
> + // Load the jump position into register x1
> + movz x1, :abs_g3:.LJUMPPOS2
> + movk x1, :abs_g2_nc:.LJUMPPOS2
> + movk x1, :abs_g1_nc:.LJUMPPOS2
> + movk x1, :abs_g0_nc:.LJUMPPOS2
> +br_teststart:
> + br x1
> + b br_testcheck
> +.LJUMPPOS2:
> + mov x0, #1
> +br_testcheck:
> + ret
> + .cfi_endproc
> + .size test_br_stepping, .-test_br_stepping
> +
> +
> +
> +// Main function calling all test functions above.
> + .text
> + .align 2
> + .global main
> + .type main, %function
> +main:
> + .cfi_startproc
> + stp x29, x30, [sp, -16]!
> + .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
> + .cfi_offset 29, -16
> + .cfi_offset 30, -8
> + bl test_blr_stepping
> + bl test_br_stepping
> + ldp x29, x30, [sp], 16
> + .cfi_restore 30
> + .cfi_restore 29
> + .cfi_def_cfa_offset 0
> + ret
> + .cfi_endproc
> + .size main, .-main
> + .section .note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
>
> <blr-patch.patch>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-23 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-03 14:55 Matthew Malcomson
2020-07-03 15:36 ` Luis Machado
2020-07-03 16:06 ` Alan Hayward
2020-07-20 11:13 ` Matthew Malcomson
2020-07-23 16:13 ` Alan Hayward [this message]
2020-07-23 16:48 ` Matthew Malcomson
2020-07-23 18:58 ` Pedro Alves
2020-08-20 12:41 ` Matthew Malcomson
2021-01-25 18:31 ` Matthew Malcomson via Gdb-patches
2021-01-25 18:44 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2021-01-26 11:13 ` Matthew Malcomson via Gdb-patches
2021-01-26 11:46 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2021-01-27 16:42 ` [Patch] GDB: aarch64: Add ability to displaced " Matthew Malcomson via Gdb-patches
2021-01-27 17:02 ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AF5A317E-E7F3-40AC-8186-F68ACC6C6D86@arm.com \
--to=alan.hayward@arm.com \
--cc=Matthew.Malcomson@arm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=luis.machado@linaro.org \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox