From: "Tedeschi, Walfred" <walfred.tedeschi@intel.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: "mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl" <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>,
"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/1] Fix PR16193 - gdbserver aborts.
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 17:08:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AC542571535E904D8E8ADAE745D60B191B1DC176@IRSMSX104.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52937A8C.9080301@redhat.com>
Hi Pedro,
In fact I didn't like this macro from the beginning on. And liked less when I saw it with AVX512.
Therefore I took the time to rewrite it. It was too awful to read in the way it was. :)
:)
I will fix the rationale.
Thanks and regards,
-Fred
-----Original Message-----
From: Pedro Alves [mailto:palves@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 5:28 PM
To: Tedeschi, Walfred
Cc: mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl; gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] Fix PR16193 - gdbserver aborts.
On 11/25/2013 03:55 PM, Walfred Tedeschi wrote:
> The MPX patch has broken the I386_XSTATE_SIZE macro. For any xcr0
> value entered return is 576. This patch fixes that and improves
> readability of the macros.
Since you still didn't explain it, I took another closer look.
I can't believe how long it took me to spot it. I kept staring at the BNDREGS and BNDCFG bits, but the issue is really in the AVX check.
> /* Get I386 XSAVE extended state size. */ #define
> I386_XSTATE_SIZE(XCR0) \
> - (((XCR0) & I386_XSTATE_BNDCFG) != 0 ? I386_XSTATE_BNDCFG_SIZE \
> - : (((XCR0) & I386_XSTATE_BNDREGS) != 0 ? I386_XSTATE_BNDCFG_SIZE \
> - : (((XCR0) & I386_XSTATE_AVX_SIZE) != 0 ? I386_XSTATE_AVX_SIZE \
The issue is here:
: (((XCR0) & I386_XSTATE_AVX_SIZE) != 0 ? I386_XSTATE_AVX_SIZE \
That should have been:
: (((XCR0) & I386_XSTATE_AVX) != 0 ? I386_XSTATE_AVX_SIZE \
Please fix the rationale in the commit log. It's not true that I386_XSTATE_SIZE _always_ returns 576. For MPX machines, the existing code returns the right value. It's only non-MPX AVX machines that get the wrong value. IOW, this one lines would be the equivalent smallest fix:
/* Get I386 XSAVE extended state size. */ #define I386_XSTATE_SIZE(XCR0) \
(((XCR0) & I386_XSTATE_BNDCFG) != 0 ? I386_XSTATE_BNDCFG_SIZE \
: (((XCR0) & I386_XSTATE_BNDREGS) != 0 ? I386_XSTATE_BNDCFG_SIZE \
- : (((XCR0) & I386_XSTATE_AVX_SIZE) != 0 ? I386_XSTATE_AVX_SIZE \
+ : (((XCR0) & I386_XSTATE_AVX) != 0 ? I386_XSTATE_AVX_SIZE \
: I386_XSTATE_SSE_SIZE)))
Something like this:
"
The MPX patch has broken the I386_XSTATE_SIZE macro. For AVX machines, it ends up returning I386_XSTATE_SSE_SIZE. Where it first reads I386_XSTATE_AVX_SIZE, it should have read I386_XSTATE_AVX:
#define I386_XSTATE_SIZE(XCR0) \
(((XCR0) & I386_XSTATE_BNDCFG) != 0 ? I386_XSTATE_BNDCFG_SIZE \
: (((XCR0) & I386_XSTATE_BNDREGS) != 0 ? I386_XSTATE_BNDCFG_SIZE \
- : (((XCR0) & I386_XSTATE_AVX_SIZE) != 0 ? I386_XSTATE_AVX_SIZE \
+ : (((XCR0) & I386_XSTATE_AVX) != 0 ? I386_XSTATE_AVX_SIZE \
: I386_XSTATE_SSE_SIZE)))
The patch goes a step further and improves readability of the macro, by adding a couple other auxiliary macros.
2013-11-25 Walfred Tedeschi <walfred.tedeschi@intel.com>
* i386-xstate.h (I386_XSTATE_MPX): New Macro.
(I386_XSTATE_MPX_MASK): Makes use of I386_XSTATE_MPX.
(HAS_MPX): New macro.
(HAS_AVX): New macro.
(I386_XSTATE_SIZE): Uses HAS_MPX and HAS_AVX.
"
> 2013-12-25 Walfred Tedeschi <walfred.tedeschi@intel.com>
Longing for Christmas? ;-)
-> Oh! Yah! :)
Intel GmbH
Dornacher Strasse 1
85622 Feldkirchen/Muenchen, Deutschland
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Feldkirchen bei Muenchen
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christian Lamprechter, Hannes Schwaderer, Douglas Lusk
Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 47456
Ust.-IdNr./VAT Registration No.: DE129385895
Citibank Frankfurt a.M. (BLZ 502 109 00) 600119052
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-25 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-25 16:28 Walfred Tedeschi
2013-11-25 17:00 ` Pedro Alves
2013-11-25 17:08 ` Tedeschi, Walfred [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AC542571535E904D8E8ADAE745D60B191B1DC176@IRSMSX104.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=walfred.tedeschi@intel.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox