From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15872 invoked by alias); 31 Aug 2010 07:26:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 15863 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Aug 2010 07:26:47 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (74.125.121.35) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 07:26:40 +0000 Received: from wpaz17.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz17.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.81]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o7V7QbA8022004 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:26:37 -0700 Received: from gxk2 (gxk2.prod.google.com [10.202.11.2]) by wpaz17.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o7V7QaAh031045 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:26:36 -0700 Received: by gxk2 with SMTP id 2so2999678gxk.34 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:26:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.179.7 with SMTP id bo7mr740008vcb.2.1283239594795; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:26:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.200.73 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:26:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201008302047.o7UKlPYR005898@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> References: <20100830070955.GA6831@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <201008302050.02945.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20100830201110.GA17151@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <201008302047.o7UKlPYR005898@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 07:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [0/9]#2 Fix lost siginfo_t From: Doug Evans To: Mark Kettenis Cc: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, pedro@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00542.txt.bz2 On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote: > I fear that it's time for another rewrite of linux-nat.c. For reference sake, I think such a rewrite wouldn't go far enough. It's time to remove all the duplicated effort in gdb vs gdbserver. [E.g. requiring gdbserver for tracepoints? blech] My $0.02.