On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Jan Kratochvil
<jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> wrote:

> I would keep it as is, there is only a risk of false PASS, not false FAIL.
> And the real FAIL would be caught by x86*.

Thanks.

I'll commit attached patch tomorrow if there are no further comments.

-- 
Paul Pluzhnikov

ChangeLog:

2011-03-15  Paul Pluzhnikov  <ppluzhnikov@google.com>

      PR gdb/12528
      * dwarf2read.c (noop_record_line): New function.
      (dwarf_decode_lines): Ignore line tables for GCd functions.

testsuite/ChangeLog:

2011-03-15  Paul Pluzhnikov  <ppluzhnikov@google.com>

      PR gdb/12528
      * gdb.base/Makefile.in: Adjust EXECUTABLES.
      * gdb.base/break-on-linker-gcd-function.exp: New test.
      * gdb.base/break-on-linker-gcd-function.cc: New file.