From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3819 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2010 23:26:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 3788 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Aug 2010 23:26:05 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (74.125.121.35) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 23:26:00 +0000 Received: from wpaz13.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz13.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.77]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o7JNPvDq022891 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:25:57 -0700 Received: from vws7 (vws7.prod.google.com [10.241.21.135]) by wpaz13.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o7JNPZUJ020342 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:25:56 -0700 Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so3143445vws.27 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:25:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.62.72 with SMTP id w8mr361144vch.32.1282260352657; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:25:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.83.37 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:25:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C460EAC.3040600@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 23:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFA] Delayed physnames, revisited From: Doug Evans To: Tom Tromey Cc: Keith Seitz , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00360.txt.bz2 On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Keith" =3D=3D Keith Seitz writes: > > Sorry about the long delay on this. > Please ping patches regularly, it helps embarrass us into responding ;-) > > Keith> I have finally gotten around to revisiting this patch and rebasing= it > Keith> on top of all the recent churn in dwarf2read.c. I have also (final= ly) > Keith> developed a test case for the "trivial" obstack leak that I previo= usly > Keith> reported. [It was trivial, but also very dependent on compiler and= STL > Keith> implementation. That made it very non-trivial. :-)] > > This patch is ok. =A0Thanks. Not to nitpick or anything, Well, yes to nitpick ... :-) Folks are great at enforcing things like putting a space after the function name in a function call, but not so good at enforcing having a blank line between a function's comment and definition. Keith, can you fix that?