From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-77039-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 7009 invoked by alias); 15 Dec 2010 07:09:12 -0000
Received: (qmail 7000 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Dec 2010 07:09:10 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (74.125.121.35)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 07:09:06 +0000
Received: from wpaz17.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz17.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.81])	by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id oBF7936O012749	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:09:03 -0800
Received: from qyj19 (qyj19.prod.google.com [10.241.83.83])	by wpaz17.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id oBF78rxf019638	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT)	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:09:02 -0800
Received: by qyj19 with SMTP id 19so1664173qyj.10        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:09:02 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.60.199 with SMTP id q7mr4720638qah.148.1292396941908; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:09:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.210.12 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:09:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <E1PSlK2-0002ic-Pj@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <20101211004734.E48242461AD@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com>	<83ei9o209o.fsf@gnu.org>	<AANLkTi=EMyuiERbXYuD=1fQf8ErxrFDGH7c_5Le9p_tz@mail.gmail.com>	<E1PSkUR-0008Mm-3v@fencepost.gnu.org>	<AANLkTingUcfwc8X=FPD467ZrHQ+WM+3Ov5TJY2pfbp4J@mail.gmail.com>	<E1PSlK2-0002ic-Pj@fencepost.gnu.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 07:09:00 -0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTinCVxvQcPx8pZotfA8RL0PV1j9yJuEMtr04OTmX@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch, doc RFA] New command-line option -na.
From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-12/txt/msg00284.txt.bz2

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> What about "gdb core" or "gdb -p PID"? =A0These are the 2 use-cases I
> mentioned that involve loading the shared libraries. =A0I know that "gdb
> hello" doesn't do that until you actually run the inferior.

Righto.