Hi, On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 03:38, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Sebastian Pop wrote on Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 08:23:15AM CET: >> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 00:35, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >> > * Sebastian Pop wrote on Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 09:47:07PM CET: >> >> here is the updated patch with your remarks and the remarks from >> >> Rainer.  We still have the libs in the same order: -lppl_c -lppl >> >> $pwllib, and I will change the order following what Roberto says. >> > >> > Well, has Roberto replied yet?  The contents of the patch depend >> > on the answer, and I'd rather review that version of the patch >> > that is supposed to go in. >> > >> > The patch looks OK for the case that pwl doesn't depend on any >> > of the other PPL libs. >> >> I have not yet received an answer for the question of whether PWL is >> independent of PPL. > > He answered now.  So the patch is OK. > >> > Please remember that toplevel patches need to be synced to src. >> >> Am I supposed to commit the configure changes to a different place >> than gcc trunk? > > Yes, to the src CVS repository, and Cc:ing binutils and gdb-patches > at sourceware.org.  See > http://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html#upstream for details. Here are the two patches that I committed to svn+ssh://spop@gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc and synced to :ext:spop@sourceware.org:/cvs/src Sebastian