From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-76375-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 23455 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2010 03:29:35 -0000
Received: (qmail 23436 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Nov 2010 03:29:34 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-iw0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-iw0-f169.google.com) (209.85.214.169)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 03:29:30 +0000
Received: by iwn9 with SMTP id 9so7324312iwn.0        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 19:29:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.33.132 with SMTP id h4mr4676848ibd.150.1289273368314; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 19:29:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.231.146.82 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 19:29:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20101109024617.GA20814@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
References: <AANLkTimJzsXFrQ+9yErKP-V63=Bn=mrQfQHNhTFdf_fq@mail.gmail.com>	<20101108143618.GA30630@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>	<AANLkTin3WfSRcmZnc2jke_Pebhp0dMM5V==0CJDBR87o@mail.gmail.com>	<20101109024617.GA20814@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 03:29:00 -0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTimV2Me4tUMpXzxF1Y=YBdKqj_riXBNA+kZAN9BY@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] solib-display.exp: displays for local variables automatically disabled
From: Xingxing Pan <forandom@gmail.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg00132.txt.bz2

Hi, Jan.

I found the reason. The arch-dependented function gdbarch_init should
reuse the existing arch.
I've to say sorry that something happend during the porting, and this
problem is not common.

Thanks,
Pan Xingxing

2010/11/9 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>:
> Hi Pan,
>
> On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 03:36:21 +0100, Xingxing Pan wrote:
>> Is it normal to have d->exp->gdbarch !=3D get_current_arch() after resta=
rt?
>
> No, that is not normal.
>
> It may be something with the Thumb vs. non-Thumb arch? =A0I do not know m=
uch
> ARM.
>
> But at least now I can image how it can happen, I will re-check it.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Jan
>