From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25541 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2010 15:43:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 25526 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Dec 2010 15:43:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (74.125.121.35) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 15:43:12 +0000 Received: from wpaz37.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz37.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.101]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id oB9Fh8mh022297 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 07:43:09 -0800 Received: from qyk29 (qyk29.prod.google.com [10.241.83.157]) by wpaz37.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id oB9FgLp3021950 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 07:43:07 -0800 Received: by qyk29 with SMTP id 29so2183343qyk.4 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 07:43:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.60.148 with SMTP id p20mr6979076qah.48.1291909387341; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 07:43:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.203.201 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 07:43:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D009357.5080008@codesourcery.com> References: <20101208181053.9444E2461AD@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> <4D009357.5080008@codesourcery.com> Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 15:43:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [commit]: dw2_expand_symtabs_with_filename: ignore type units From: Doug Evans To: Yao Qi Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-12/txt/msg00112.txt.bz2 On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Yao Qi wrote: > On 12/09/2010 02:10 AM, Doug Evans wrote: >> + =A0 =A0 The routine may ignore debug info that is known to not be usef= ul with > > Shall we use "not to be" or "to not be" in comments above? I like the current wording.